Adds 4 (technically 5) new tools to the zed agent, corresponding to LSP
actions:
- `find_references`
- `goto_definition`
- `rename_symbol`
- `get_code_actions` and `apply_code_actions`
Notes:
- `rename_symbol` skips doing a `prepare_rename`. If there is nothing to
rename at the position, it will forward the error to the agent
- The code action tools are stateful. The state is stored in the
`get_code_actions` tool itself as a `PendingCodeActions`. It is not
passed into/out of subagents. Calling `apply_code_actions` without
calling `get_code_actions` first is an error, but I've never seen an
agent do this
Symbols are identified by:
- file name
- line number
- symbol
If there is no substring match on that line for the symbol text, it is
an error. If there are multiple, it chooses the first. This may not be
great if you have a line like: `fn convert(x: foo::Something) ->
bar::Something` - the second `Something` is a different symbol, but is
inacessible to these tools. Probably fine for now, but we can look into
improving
Release Notes:
- Added: New tools for the Zed Agent for interacting with language
servers
---------
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <me@lukaswirth.dev>
This PR adds a feature to automatically cycle through screen shares
during calls, designed for demo days or any call that has a lot of
screen share use.
This is a preliminary attempt behind a feature flag so we can dogfood
and iterate, or toss it out.
There's a new toggle next to the active channel name in the collab
panel: **Auto Watch Screens**.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ae6eccec-7921-4c1f-8921-c8093631c705
This video demonstrates some cases:
Basic auto-watch
- Toggle on → automatically opens the next screen share that starts
- When the watched screen share ends, switches to the next available
share
Queuing
- Someone starts sharing while another share is active → doesn't
interrupt the current share
- When the current share ends, the queued share is picked up
automatically
Paused while sharing
- Auto-watch pauses when you start sharing your own screen, so other
shares don't pop up during your presentation
- When you stop sharing, auto-watch resumes and opens the next available
share
Multiple watchers
- Multiple people can have auto-watch enabled independently — they all
see the same transitions
Note that we don't manage the screenshares, livekit does, so this change
is entirely on the client. I think that's mostly fine, but there is a
chance 2 separate clients queues up a different person as the next
watched peer if they both engage screenshare around the same time,
depending on how it hits the clients, but it seems pretty edge case. We
can move the implementation to collab, but it will be more of a project,
and adding a secondary source alongside of livekit that could get out of
sync and have its own issues.
UI/UX needs work (@danilo-leal for suggestions)
Self-Review Checklist:
- [X] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [X] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [X] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [X] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [X] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Yara 🏳️⚧️ <11743287+yara-blue@users.noreply.github.com>
We already enabled the feature flag, but that only applies to logged in
users. Going to make sure that everyone gets the new tool as long as the
model supports it.
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- agent: Improve edit tool performance for models that support streaming
tool calls.
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
Follow up to #54206
`on_flags_ready` relied on the fact that the `FeatureFlagStore` was only
set once the flags had been received from the server.
However, after #54206 the global gets instantiated earlier, without the
flags being resolved.
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR revamps our feature flag system, to enable richer iteration.
Feature flags can now:
- Support enum values, for richer configuration
- Be manually set via the settings file
- Be manually set via the settings UI
This PR also adds a feature flag to demonstrate this behavior, a
`agent-thread-worktree-label`, which controls which how the worktree tag
UI displays.
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
Based on a partial revert of: 7bcdb12b4c
The main difference is instead of a feature flag we now check
`ReleaseChannel::Stable` != current_release_channel when the UI checks
if agent v2 (sidebar) features should be enabled.
Self-Review Checklist:
- [ ] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [ ] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [ ] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [ ] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- N/A or Added/Fixed/Improved ...
---------
Co-authored-by: Max Brunsfeld <maxbrunsfeld@gmail.com>
- Introduce `project_panel::Redo` action
- Update all platform keymaps in order to map
`redo`/`ctrl-shift-z`/`cmd-shift-z` to the `project_panel::Redo` action
### Restore Entry Support
- Update both `Project::delete_entry` and `Worktree::delete_entry` to
return the resulting `fs::TrashedEntry`
- Introduce both `Project::restore_entry` and `Worktree::restore_entry`
to allow restoring an entry in a worktree, given the `fs::TrashedEntry`
- Worth pointing out that support for restoring is not yet implemented
for remote worktrees, as that will be dealt with in a separate pull
request
### Undo Manager
- Split `ProjectPanelOperation` into two different enums, `Change` and
`Operation`
- While thinking through this, we noticed that simply recording the
operation that user was performing was not enough, specifically in the
case where undoing would restore the file, as in that specific case, we
needed the `trash::TrashedEntry` in order to be able to restore, so we
actually needed the result of executing the operation.
- Having that in mind, we decided to separate the operation (intent)
from the change (result), and record the change instead. With the change
being recorded, we can easily building the operation that needs to be
executed in order to invert that change.
- For example, if an user creates a new file, we record the
`ProjectPath` where the file was created, so that undoing can be a
matter of trashing that file. When undoing, we keep track of the
`trash::TrashedEntry` resulting from trashing the originally created
file, such that, redoing is a matter of restoring the
`trash::TrashedEntry`.
- Refer to the documentation in the `project_panel::undo` module for a
better breakdown on how this is implemented/handled.
- Introduce a task queue for dealing with recording changes, as well as
undo and redo requests in a sequential manner
- This meant moving some of the details in `UndoManager` to a
`project_panel::undo::Inner` implementation, and `UndoManager` now
serves as a simple wrapper/client around the inner implementation,
simply communicating with it to record changes and handle undo/redo
requests
- Callers that depend on the `UndoManager` now simply record which
changes they wish to track, which are then sent to the undo manager's
inner implementation
- Same for the undo and redo requests, those are simply sent to the undo
manager's inner implementation, which then deals with picking the
correct change from the history and executing its inverse operation
- Introduce support for tracking restore changes and operations
- `project_panel::undo::Change::Restored` – Keeps track that the
file/directory associated with the `ProjectPath` was a result of
restoring a trashed entry, for which we now that reverting is simply a
matter of trashing the path again
- `project_panel::undo::Operation::Restore` – Keeps track of both the
worktree id and the `TrashedEntry`, from which we can build the original
`ProjectPath` where the trashed entry needs to be restored
- Move project panel's undo tests to a separate module
`project_panel::tests::undo` to avoid growing the
`project::project_panel_tests` module into a monolithic test module
- Some of the functions in `project::project_panel_tests` were made
`pub(crate)` in order for us to be able to call those from
`project_panel::tests::undo`
### FS Changes
- Refactored the `Fs::trash_file` and `Fs::trash_dir` methods into a
single `Fs::trash` method
- This can now be done because `RealFs::trash_dir` and
`RealFs::trash_file` were simply calling `trash::delete_with_info`, so
we can simplify the trait
- Tests have also been simplified to reflect this new change, so we no
longer need a separate test for trashing a file and trashing a directory
- Update `Fs::trash` and `Fs::restore` to be async
- On the `RealFs` implementation we're now spawning a thread to perform
the trash/restore operation
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Relates to #5039
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Yara <git@yara.blue>
Co-authored-by: Miguel Raz Guzmán Macedo <miguel@zed.dev>
Co-authored-by: Marshall Bowers <git@maxdeviant.com>
It's happening.
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
After #52953 gets merged the git graph will be ready for it's preview
release, so we can finally remove the feature flag! AKA this PR releases
the git graph
Self-Review Checklist:
- [ ] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [ ] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [ ] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [ ] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- Add Git Graph. Can be accessed through the button on the bottom of the
git panel or the `git graph: Open` action
## Context
Adds a tool to utilize the UI we already expose to ACP agents. Behind a
feature flag for now.
## How to Review
Mostly a tool to hook up to all of the plan plumbing we already have in
acp thread.
## Self-Review Checklist
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
- Add `project_panel::undo::UndoManager` with a bounded operation stack
to track and revert project panel operations
- Support undoing file and directory creation, renaming, moving, pasting
and drag-and-drop operations
- Revert batch operations sequentially in reverse order to handle
dependencies between them
- Show an error notification when one or more undo operations fail
- Add "Undo" entry to the project panel context menu, disabled when
there is nothing to undo
- Gate the feature behind the `project-panel-undo-redo` feature flag
Ref: #5039
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Signed-off-by: Marco Mihai Condrache <52580954+marcocondrache@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Cole Miller <cole@zed.dev>
Co-authored-by: dino <dinojoaocosta@gmail.com>
String panics are a non-trivial percentage of the crashes we see at Zed,
and
doubly unfortunately they may incidentally include the contents of a
user's
buffer.
Although this hasn't happened yet (to my knowledge), I don't want to be
in the position of having received sensitive information this way.
See also https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/153677
Release Notes:
- N/A
Remove the separate `AgentGitWorktreesFeatureFlag` and replace all its
checks with the existing `AgentV2FeatureFlag`. The git worktree
functionality is now gated behind the same flag as agent v2.
Changes:
- Removed `AgentGitWorktreesFeatureFlag` from `feature_flags`
- Replaced all `has_flag::<AgentGitWorktreesFeatureFlag>()` checks with
`has_flag::<AgentV2FeatureFlag>()`
- Simplified toolbar condition that was redundantly checking both flags
- Updated tests accordingly
Closes AI-73
Release Notes:
- N/A
Release Notes:
- agent: Add new `spawn_agent` tool which allows the Zed Agent to
utilize subagents for doing tasks in parallel and better context
management.
Co-authored-by: Bennet Bo Fenner <bennetbo@gmx.de>
- Enabled opening the Git Graph, with the corresponding commit detail
drawer open, from the commit view
- Redesigned the commit view's header and toolbar to allow addition of
the Git Graph icon button
- Redesigned icons for the Git Graph and commit view
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8efef60a-0893-4752-9b40-838da21ceb54
---
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have:
- [x] Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing
- [x] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects
- [x] Aligned any UI changes with the [UI
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
Release Notes:
- N/A (_Git Graph is still feature flagged, so no release notes for
now_)
This PR removes the `cloud-thinking-effort` feature flag to ship the
thinking effort UI for the Zed provider.
Release Notes:
- Added support for controlling thinking effort levels with supported
models using the Zed provider.
Accidentally committed the feature flag change in
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/49100 as I had it turned to
true for local testing. This PR makes it turned off to staff again,
sorry!
Release Notes:
- N/A
It's happeningggggg
Release Notes:
- Changed the Agent Panel so that the Active Thread is restored on
restart.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Danilo Leal <daniloleal09@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Anthony Eid <anthony@zed.dev>
Co-authored-by: Danilo Leal <67129314+danilo-leal@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Feldman <richard@zed.dev>
Co-authored-by: Zed Zippy <234243425+zed-zippy[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR renames the `cloud-thinking-toggle` feature flag to
`cloud-thinking-effort`.
This feature flag has expanded slightly in scope, so we want the name to
be more representative of what it gates.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Co-authored-by: Tom Houlé <tom@tomhoule.com>
This PR adds a thinking toggle for controlling whether to use thinking
for a model in the Zed provider:
<img width="645" height="142" alt="Screenshot 2026-01-22 at 12 34 01 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9aa543fe-e708-4840-8b38-1a6fbcb78388"
/>
Previously we would create separate "Thinking" variants of the models
that supported thinking in the model selector.
This only applies to Anthropic models in the Zed provider, currently.
This is gated behind the `cloud-thinking-toggle` feature flag.
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Neel <neel@zed.dev>
## Summary
Implements user-defined slash commands for the agent panel. Users can
create markdown files in `~/.config/zed/commands/` (user-wide) or
`.zed/commands/` (project-specific) that expand into templated text when
invoked via `/command_name` in the chat interface.
## Features
- **File-based commands**: Create `.md` files that become slash commands
- **Template expansion**: Use `$1`, `$2`, etc. for positional arguments,
or `$ARGUMENTS` for all args
- **Namespacing**: Subdirectories create namespaced commands (e.g.,
`frontend/component.md` → `/frontend:component`)
- **Project & user scopes**: Project commands in `.zed/commands/`, user
commands in config dir
- **Claude compatibility**: Can symlink `~/.claude/commands/` for
compatibility
- **Caching**: Commands are cached and watched for file changes
- **Error handling**: Graceful degradation with error display in UI
## Feature Flag
Behind `user-slash-commands` feature flag.
## Testing
52 unit/integration tests covering parsing, validation, expansion, file
loading, symlinks, and error handling.
---
Release Notes:
- N/A (behind feature flag)
---------
Co-authored-by: Zed Zippy <234243425+zed-zippy[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR removes the `open-ai-responses-api` feature flag and makes it so
all OpenAI requests to the Zed provider use the Responses API.
We've been running this in Nightly/Preview for a week now without any
issues.
Closes CLO-104.
Release Notes:
- N/A
## Summary
This PR adds the UI for displaying subagent tool calls:
### Thread view changes
- Add `expanded_subagents` state HashMap for tracking expanded cards
- Implement `render_subagent_tool_call()` for collapsed card with label
and chevron
- Add subagent detection via `is_subagent()` and `tool_name` field
- Handle `SubagentThread` content type in tool call rendering
- Add expand/collapse toggle button for subagent cards
- Style collapsed cards similar to terminal tool calls
- Support inline image rendering in content blocks
### Agent panel changes
- Add `open_external_thread_with_server()` for testing with stubbed
servers
### Test support
- Add `acp_thread/test-support` feature to agent_ui
- Add base64 dev dependency for image tests
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Amp <amp@ampcode.com>
Adds a very simple diff review button behind a feature flag, which
appears in the gutter of people who have the flag (currently just me;
it's not even enabled for staff, since it doesn't do anything yet).
Mostly this PR just adds the feature flag, the button, and tests.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR adds support for using the OpenAI Responses API through the Zed
provider.
This is gated behind the `open-ai-responses-api` feature flag.
Part of CLO-34.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR adds the foundation for the subagents feature:
- Add `SubagentsFeatureFlag` with staff-disabled default
- Create `SubagentTool` struct with input schema for
task/summary/context-low prompts
- Register `SubagentTool` conditionally when feature flag is enabled
- Tool returns stub message 'not yet implemented' for now
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Amp <amp@ampcode.com>
Co-authored-by: Mikayla Maki <mikayla@zed.dev>
Co-authored-by: Yara <yara@zed.dev>
🔜
TODO:
- [x] Add a utility pane to the left and right edges of the workspace
- [x] Add a maximize button to the left and right side of the pane
- [x] Add a new agents pane
- [x] Add a feature flag turning these off
POV: You're working agentically
<img width="354" height="606" alt="Screenshot 2025-12-13 at 11 50 14 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ce5469f9-adc2-47f5-a978-a48bf992f5f7"
/>
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Nathan Sobo <nathan@zed.dev>
Co-authored-by: Zed <zed@zed.dev>
Tighten up evals, make assistant less talkative, get them passing a bit
more, improve telemetry, stream in failure messages, and turn it on for
staff.
Release Notes:
- N/A
