This was originally just to fix
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/4354, which I did by just
returning the previous offset in `find_boundary`.. but `find_boundary`
is used in the "insert mode" / normal editor too, so returning the
previous boundary breaks existing functionality in that case.
I was considering a new `find_boundary` function just for some of the
vim motions like this, but I thought that this is straightforward enough
and future Vim functions might need similar logic too.
Release Notes:
- Fixed https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/4354
This fixes `t` not being repeatable with `,` and `;` in normal mode.
Release Notes:
- Fixed `t` in Vim mode not being repeatable with `,` or `;`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Conrad <conrad@zed.dev>
This change implements the vim
[motion](https://github.com/vim/vim/blob/master/runtime/doc/motion.txt)
commands to move the cursor to the top, middle and bottom of the visible
view. This feature is requested in
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/4941.
This change takes inspiration from
[crates/vim/src/normal/scroll.rs](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/crates/vim/src/normal/scroll.rs).
A note on the behavior of these commands: Because
`NeovimBackedTestContext` requires compatibility with nvim, the current
implementation causes slightly non-standard behavior: it causes the
editor to scroll a few lines. The standard behavior causes no scrolling.
It is easy enough to account for the margin by adding
`VERTICAL_SCROLL_MARGIN`. However, doing so will cause test failures due
to the disparity between nvim and zed states. Perhaps
`NeovimBackedTestContext` should have a switch to be more tolerant for
such cases.
Release Notes:
- Added support for moving to top, middle and bottom of the screen in
vim mode (`H`, `M`, and `L`)
([#4941](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/4941)).
Closes#4358
The bug originates on this line:
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/2751970cf856909897c6f3005536387ae4cbe606/crates/vim/src/motion.rs#L451
- When running "dtx" on "ˇabcx", the range to delete is 0 -> 2 ("abc")
- When running "dtx" on "abˇcx", the range to delete is 2 -> 2 ("c"), so
`new_point == point` and the function incorrectly returns `None` and "c"
is not deleted
- We need to disambiguate between the "not found" case and the "found
immediately to the right" case
- This bug does not apply to the backwards case ("dTx")
Release Notes:
- Fixed "dtx" vim key combination when "x" is immediately to the right
of the cursor (#4358)
Before this change up and down were in display co-ordinates, after this
change they are in fold coordinates (which matches the vim behaviour).
To make this work without causing usabliity problems, a bunch of extra
keyboard shortcuts now work:
- vim: `z {o,c}` to open,close a fold
- vim: `z f` to fold current visual selection
- vim: `g {j,k,up,down}` to move up/down a display line
- vim: `g {0,^,$,home,end}` to get to start/end of a display line
Fixes: zed-industries/community#1562
- vim: support P for paste before
- vim: support P in visual mode for paste without overriding clipboard
- vim: fix position when using `p` on text copied outside zed
- vim: fix indentation when using `p` on text copied from zed
Andrew Marek