Closes #ISSUE
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have:
- [ ] Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing
- [ ] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects
- [ ] Aligned any UI changes with the [UI
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
Release Notes:
- N/A *or* Added/Fixed/Improved ...
Closes #ISSUE
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have:
- [ ] Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing
- [ ] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects
- [ ] Aligned any UI changes with the [UI
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
Release Notes:
- N/A *or* Added/Fixed/Improved ...
Co-authored-by: Max <max@zed.dev>
Previously, we were not computing excerpt regions correctly for EP
examples captured from prod. This PR fixes that, and also simplifies the
data flow in the EP CLI. Examples either come from a concise spec (like
the markdown evals), or are collected from prod. Either way, we compute
from them a `ZetaPromptInput`, and the downstream steps like
prompt-formatting and scoring are derived from that.
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Ben Kunkle <ben@zed.dev>
This will not affect how Zeta 2 behaves in production until we update
Cloud to pull in the changes to the `zeta_prompt` crate. But from some
early testing, it seems to improve behavior, not worsen it, even though
the editable region size differs from the currently-deployed model's
training data.
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Oleksiy Syvokon <oleksiy.syvokon@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ben Kunkle <ben@zed.dev>
Co-authored-by: Zed Zippy <234243425+zed-zippy[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
The `unreachable()` assumption at `queue_prediction_refresh` could be
violated by an async race condition:
1. `request_prediction_internal` spawns an async task
2. The task awaits a prediction request
3. If the prediction returns `None`, it calls `queue_prediction_refresh`
4. Between the time the prediction was initiated (when the provider was
an EP-store provider) and when the async callback runs, the user can
change their edit prediction provider setting to a non-EP-store provider
5. `queue_prediction_refresh` re-reads the settings and hits the
`unreachable!()
Release Notes:
- N/A
Release Notes:
- Added the ability to use a self-hosted OpenAI-compatible server for
edit predictions.
---------
Co-authored-by: Ben Kunkle <ben@zed.dev>
Co-authored-by: Zed Zippy <234243425+zed-zippy[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes #ISSUE
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have:
- [ ] Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing
- [ ] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects
- [ ] Aligned any UI changes with the [UI
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
Release Notes:
- N/A *or* Added/Fixed/Improved ...
---------
Co-authored-by: Zed Zippy <234243425+zed-zippy[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This allows us to just pull requests that have the latest EP request
schema with the `predicted` boolean on events in the edit history.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR updates the `Edit Prediction Rated` event to be routed through
Cloud instead of the normal telemetry pipeline.
Closes CLO-224.
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Tom <tom@zed.dev>
This allows us to switch the prompt format without client-side changes.
If we want to experiment with prompt formats or models other than the
currently-deployed one, we can use the raw endpoint, and do prompt
construction and output processing on the client.
This also adds an optional environment parameter to the raw endpoint, so
that we can use that endpoint in the new scheme where we're deploying to
separate environments for different zeta prompt versions.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This also fixes the isolated whitespace change metric, which is not
takes cursor position into account (it's okay to insert a newline if it
has a cursor on it)
Release Notes:
- N/A
### Summary
Adds accept/reject tracking for Mercury edit predictions.
### Changes
Sends events to https://api-feedback.inceptionlabs.ai/feedback when:
Accept — user presses Tab
Reject — user presses Escape
Ignore — prediction dismissed implicitly (typing, cursor move, etc.)
Added `discard_explicit` method to the delegate trait to distinguish
explicit vs implicit dismissal. Updated `reject_prediction` and
`reject_current_prediction` methods with an `explicit` bool parameter to
thread this through to the Mercury feedback logic. Other providers are
unaffected—they use the default implementation.
Feedback is fire-and-forget in a background thread, only sent for
predictions that were shown.
### Data Collected
- Request ID (returned from Inception API)
- User action (either accept/reject/ignore)
- Client Zed version (to track updates made to Zed client which could
potentially affect nextedit implementation)
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Ben Kunkle <ben@zed.dev>
Previously, Ollama would not show up as available until you opened some
UI that prompted connecting to Ollama, like the agent panel or the edit
prediction settings.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Closes#48097
Release Notes:
- Fixed Copilot instances not being cleared up after their window is
closed.
- Copilot edit prediction provider now respects `disable_ai` setting.
* [x] capture and store teacher model's predicted cursor position
* [x] provide cursor position to student during distillation
* [x] eval cursor positions
* [x] parse and apply cursor position predictions at runtime
Release Notes:
- N/A
Max Brunsfeld