This should have no user-visible impact.
For vim `.` to repeat it's important that actions are replayable.
Currently editor::MoveDown *sometimes* moves the cursor down, and
*sometimes* selects the next completion.
For replay we need to be able to separate the two.
This changes vim motions to be relative to fold lines, not display
lines, to match the behaviour of vim.
This is necessary for relative line numbers to make sense (as the most
important thing is you can do `3j` to get th e line that is numbered 3).
Release Notes:
- vim: Fix handling of motions when `soft_wrap` is enabled in zed. Like
in vim `j,k,up,down,$,^,0,home,end` will all now navigate in file
coordinates not display coordinates.
- vim: Add `g {j,k,up,down,$,^,0,home,end}` to navigate in display
coordinates.
- vim: Add `z o` and `z c` to open and close folds.
- vim: Add `z f` in visual mode to fold selection.
Note: this may be a jarring change if you're grown used to the current
behaviour of `j` and `k`. You can make the issue less acute by setting
`"soft_wrap":"none"` in your settings; or you can manually copy the
bindings for `g j` to the binding for `j` (etc.) in your keymap.json to
preserve the existing behaviour.
Omit in buffers with one or zero running language servers with the
capability to provide completions
Co-Authored-By: Antonio Scandurra <antonio@zed.dev>
See Linear description for the full explanation of the issue. This PR is
mostly a mechanical change, except for the one case where we do pass in
an explicit `next_id` instead of `model_id` in project.rs.
Release Notes:
- Fixed a bug where some results were not reported in project search in
presence of unnamed buffers.
Miltibuffer emits edit events even if it only got an excerpt
added/removed/etc.
Separate buffer edits and trigger hint invalidation refresh for them
only, also trigger hint new lines refresh on excerpt addition events.
Nathan Sobo