This PR temporarily disables deployments of the docs.
There seems to be some lingering fallout from
https://www.cloudflarestatus.com/incidents/jk2mx637l9k9 that is causing
new deployments to not work.
We are rolling back to an older deployment, and are disabling deploys so
that we don't clobber the rollback.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This moves the extension CLI job into xtask and also extends this a bit
- whenever we now run the job, it will open PRs against this repo and
`zed-industries/extensions` to also update the SHAs there. These PRs
will be assigned to the actor that initiated the bump so they can edit
the PR as needed.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This is still only a debugging/evaluation version (which is why it has
e.g. hardcoded stuff). It successfully ran a few times triggered
manually, so we're replacing the broken version on `main` with this to
see how it fares on incoming issues.
Release Notes:
- N/A
GitHub allows defining a default shell for all jobs on the workflow
level, which we did not use before, yet practically did when it comes
down to our usage of `named::bash`. Since this makes stuff quite
verbose, I decided on using the defaults instead so the workflows become
somewhat easier to audit when reading the generated files.
Powershell steps continue to use Powershell, only the default for bash
scripts was modified.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Follow up to #47714 because it is still broken for the extension
workflows post #47699 cache introduction. Keeping the cache around
though in the hopes that it will now finally work.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Following the changes to the namespace caching, CI in the extensions
broke because cache conflicts arose there seemingly. Trying to set the
target here more explicitly in an effort to fix this.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This is in preparation for removing one of the files in favor of having
just one larger one (and perhaps renaming that in the future).
Release Notes:
- N/A
The last extension has now been migrated to the new workflows and with
that, the entire zed-extensions org now uses the centralized workflows 🎉
Given this, we can now remove the exclusion list and - as a little bonus
- also rollout changes automatically to the repository hosting the
shared workflows.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Sometimes github issues are created without following the template, and
if they don't receive the `state:needs triage` label from a template,
it's easy for us to miss them. Well, not anymore, thanks to this new
github workflow.
As an extra measure, the label is also added on reopened issues. All of
this only applies only to actions carried out by people outside of the
staff team.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Remove the attempts to have these issues land in the same 'inbox' (the
existing project board for triage). Since they're closed, the automated
workflow of the project board will move them to the 'Closed'
column/status even with the API call specifically moving them to
'Incoming' instead. It is what it is, we'll have a separate project
board for this.
Also:
- don't look at comments on PRs
- don't freak out if the issue has no type
- add a permissions block as a defensive measure (in case someone adds
secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN later)
- add a timeout to avoid hanging out for six hours or whatever the
default is
- add some logging.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Since the project board to which the closed bugs with new comments are
added might have an automated workflow for moving closed issues to the
"Done" status, we need to override the status to ensure the bugs are
actually surfaced to the team and not buried in "Done".
Release Notes:
- N/A
Sometimes bugs come back or are not fixed all the way. We want to
preserve the context of the issue we've closed prematurely so instead of
always making people open a new github issue in this case we want to be
able to notice if someone* comments on a closed bug and decide what to
do about it.
Before:
Bug is closed → A user can again/still reproduce it on a new version and
leaves a comment → Maybe someone sees the notification about it, maybe
not; maybe they see it but forget to act on it right away and it's lost.
After:
Bug is closed → A user can again/still reproduce it on a new version and
leaves a comment → The issue is added to a project board where it's
visible until someone makes a call about it (maybe the comment was “oh
my glob i'm so happy this was fixed” and no action is needed, or maybe
the issue must be reopened as a regression).
*Someone in this case means (1) not a bot, (2) not a member of staff.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR updates the `bump_patch_version.yml` to also be generated by
`cargo xtask workflows` and updates this to use the `zed-zippy` identity
instead of the `ConradIrwin` identity.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Updates the community champions list to the latest state, adding some of
our active extension contributors, and sorts the list/removes
duplicates.
Release Notes:
- N/A
I changed the runner sizes to a smaller but more recent image yesterday
and broke the version bumping in the process. This PR fixes this by
force installing the needed package.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Conrad Irwin