This is a PR I built for a friend of a friend at StrangeLoop, who is
making a much better LSP for elixir that elixir folks want to experiment
with. This PR also improves the our debug log viewer to handle LSP
restarts.
TODO:
- [ ] Make sure NextLS binary loading works.
Release Notes:
- Added support for the experimental Next LS for Elxir, to enable it add
the following field to your settings to enable:
```json
"elixir": {
"next": "on"
}
```
Targeting Preview of 09.27.
This is still pending several touchups/clearups:
- We should watch multibuffer for changes and rescan the excerpts. This
should also update match count.
- Closing editor while multibuffer with 100's of changed files is open
leads to us prompting for save once per each file in the multibuffer.
One could in theory save in multibuffer before closing it (thus avoiding
unnecessary prompts), but it'd be cool to be able to "Save all"/"Discard
All".
Release Notes:
- Added "Replace in project" functionality
This is still WIP, mostly pending styling. I added a pretty rudimentary
text field and no buttons whatsoever other than that. I am targeting a
Preview of 09.13, as I am gonna be on PTO for the next week.
I dislike the current implementation slightly because of `regex`'s crate
syntax and lack of support of backreferences. What strikes me as odd wrt
to syntax is that it will just replace a capture name with empty string
if that capture is missing from the regex. While this is perfectly fine
behaviour for conditionally-matched capture groups (e.g. `(foo)?`), I
think it should still error out if there's no group with a given name
(conditional or not).
Release Notes:
- Added "Replace" functionality to buffer search.
In some situations outside JSX elements Tailwind will never
respond to a completion request, holding up the tsserver completions.
Only submit the request to Tailwind when we wouldn't get tsserver
completions anyway and don't submit to Tailwind when we know we won't
get Tailwind completions
Co-Authored-By: Kirill Bulatov <kirill@zed.dev>
See Linear description for the full explanation of the issue. This PR is
mostly a mechanical change, except for the one case where we do pass in
an explicit `next_id` instead of `model_id` in project.rs.
Release Notes:
- Fixed a bug where some results were not reported in project search in
presence of unnamed buffers.
This is the first batch of improvements to current project search. There
are few things we can do better still, but I want to get this out in
next Preview.
Most of the slowness at this point seems to stem from updating UI too
often.
Release Notes:
- Improved project search by making it report results sooner.
---------
Co-authored-by: Julia Risley <julia@zed.dev>
Use word_characters to feed completion trigger characters as well and
also recognize kebab as a potential sub-word splitter. This is fine for
non-kebab-case languages because we'd only ever attempt to split a word
with a kebab in it in language scopes which are kebab-cased
Co-Authored-By: Max Brunsfeld <max@zed.dev>
This isn't ready to go - I'm opening a PR to ask for some advice. When
activating a python virtual environment, the typical command used is
`source path_to_venv/bin/activate`. The problem is, the activatate
script isn't portable to all shells, so some additional scripts are
bundled in the env, for example, `activate.fish`. We don't have a good
way of knowing what shell we are in, in order to know what script to
run.
Julia gave the alternative of simply activating the virtual environment
while in the zsh context, before the user's custom shell is launched,
which I think does work, but because we activate the virtual environment
before we launch the custom shell, the shell isn't really aware that we
are in the virtual environment and it fails to display the information
in the prompt that is typically shown after activating.
Is there a clean way for us to know for a fact what shell is being ran,
so we know what script to run?
Check out the code comments below for more context.
---
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/assets/19867440/ddb76aaa-152b-4c93-a513-3cd580b7c40f
I've used Zed to write Python scripts, but working on an actual project
has really magnified where Python dev is falling short. A huge
quality-of-life thing we can do is provide a setting to automaticaly
search for and activate virtual environments when found, when terminals
are created. Manually starting these up in every terminal instance is
such a drag.
A few quirks:
- We don't have a way of knowing if the prompt is ready before we try
run the command, which means we see the text inserted at the top of the
terminal and on the prompt - I dont think this should be a blocker
though.
- If a user has multiple python projects with mutliple virtual
environments, we only detect and activate the first one, since can't
really make any assumptions about which one to activate. I dont think
this should be a blocker either, as I think most users will have a
single project open in Zed.
Release Notes:
- Added a `detect_venv` setting for the terminal. When configured, the
Zed terminal will automatically activate Python virtual environments on
terminal creation.
Without holding all hints in host's cache, this is impossile.
Currenly, we keep hint caches separate and isolated, so this will not
work when we actually resolve.
Kirill Bulatov