Happy New Years! This PR is a second take at
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/38127 (cc @ConradIrwin)
This PR is significantly less complicated than the last attempt: while
we still keep our data on the `NavigationHistory` object, we no longer
tightly integrate it with the existing back/forward "browser history."
Instead, we keep our own stack of `(origin, target)` pairs (in a struct
to make it easy to extend with e.g., tag names in the future).
The PR is split into two separable commits. Most of the implementation
is in the second commit, which:
- Defines the stack data structure
- Implements `pane::GoToOlderTag` and `pane::GoToNewerTag` in terms of
the stack
- Hooks into `navigate_to_hover_links` to push tag stack entries
This last bit is the most fiddly. The core challenge is that we need to
keep track of the `origin` location and calculate the `target` location
across three codepaths that might involve creating a new editor and/or
splitting the pane. One thing in particular I found difficult was that
an editor's `nav_history` (an `ItemNavHistory`) seems to be populated
asynchronously. Instead of relying on it, I decided in this code to make
my own `ItemNavHistory`. I briefly tried to refactor the code in
question, but it seemed like it would significantly increase the scope
of the change.
I prefer this all-in-one tracking centered around
`navigate_to_hover_links ` to the `start/finish` approach taken in
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/commit/b69a2ea200561de9de0edf4d0c4428ee887fb918
because I find it easier to convince myself that the right data is being
populated at the right times. Of course, let me know if you think
there's a better solution.
Closes#14206
Release Notes:
- ??? I don't know what to write here! Suggestions welcome
Editor is a choke point in our compilation graph while also being a very
common crate that is being edited. So reducing things that depend on it
will generally improve compilation times for us.
Release Notes:
- N/A *or* Added/Fixed/Improved ...
Re-applies https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/30840
This PR re-applies the initial
[PR](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/30840). As it was closed
because it was hard to land, because of the many conflicts. This PR
re-applies the changes for it.
In several cases we were creating multiple display_map
snapshots within the same root-level function call.
Creating a display_map snapshot is quite slow, and in some
cases we were creating the snapshot multiple times.
Release Notes:
- N/A
We have unnecessary clones for the fields here as most of the snapshots
contain the others hierarchically.
Release Notes:
- N/A *or* Added/Fixed/Improved ...
Closes https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/38690Closes#37353
### Background
On Windows, paths are normally separated by `\`, unlike mac and linux
where they are separated by `/`. When editing code in a project that
uses a different path style than your local system (e.g. remoting from
Windows to Linux, using WSL, and collaboration between windows and unix
users), the correct separator for a path may differ from the "native"
separator.
Previously, to work around this, Zed converted paths' separators in
numerous places. This was applied to both absolute and relative paths,
leading to incorrect conversions in some cases.
### Solution
Many code paths in Zed use paths that are *relative* to either a
worktree root or a git repository. This PR introduces a dedicated type
for these paths called `RelPath`, which stores the path in the same way
regardless of host platform, and offers `Path`-like manipulation APIs.
RelPath supports *displaying* the path using either separator, so that
we can display paths in a style that is determined at runtime based on
the current project.
The representation of absolute paths is left untouched, for now.
Absolute paths are different from relative paths because (except in
contexts where we know that the path refers to the local filesystem)
they should generally be treated as opaque strings. Currently we use a
mix of types for these paths (std::path::Path, String, SanitizedPath).
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Cole Miller <cole@zed.dev>
Co-authored-by: Piotr Osiewicz <24362066+osiewicz@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Peter Tripp <petertripp@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Smit Barmase <heysmitbarmase@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <me@lukaswirth.dev>
In #32656 I generalized the argument to change selections to allow
controling both the scroll and the nav history (and the completion
trigger).
To avoid conflicting with ongoing debugger cherry-picks I left the
argument as an `impl Into<>`, but I think it's clearer to make callers
specify what they want here.
I converted a lot of `None` arguments to `SelectionEffects::no_scroll()`
to be exactly compatible; but I think many people used none as an "i
don't care" value in which case Default::default() might be more
appropraite
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- N/A
In #32656 I generalized the argument to change selections to allow
controling both the scroll and the nav history (and the completion
trigger).
To avoid conflicting with ongoing debugger cherry-picks I left the
argument as an `impl Into<>`, but I think it's clearer to make callers
specify what they want here.
I converted a lot of `None` arguments to `SelectionEffects::no_scroll()`
to be exactly compatible; but I think many people used none as an "i
don't care" value in which case Default::default() might be more
appropraite
- Switch stack frame list and module list to `UniformList` to access
scrolling behavior
- Implement `menu::` navigation actions
Release Notes:
- Debugger Beta: Added support for menu navigation actions (`ctrl-n`,
`ctrl-p`, etc.) in the stack frame list and module list.
This PR adds the ability to expand a debugger stack trace into a multi
buffer and view each frame as it's own excerpt.
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Remco Smits <djsmits12@gmail.com>
Carl Jackson