Users of keyboard layout with IME complained about the peculiar
behaviour where typing in "sss" and then removing all of it left behind
one 's' and also appended a closing brace. This was not reproducible on
a buffer without language, so I've suspected that brace insertion might
be a problem here. For whatever reason when the user removes the last
character from a run that triggered IME, we receive a notification about
an empty insertion. Sadly, brace completion does not handle an empty
input properly and we erroneously insert a closing brace when deleting
the followup characters. In fact, the brace inserted is always the
closing brace for the first entry in language's config.toml 'brackets'
field (see Scheme vs Markdown). This guard also allows for the proper
removal of the first character.
Closes community tickets zed-industries/community#877zed-industries/community#1329
Z-2869
Release Notes:
- Fixed handling of bracket completion for international keyboard
layouts that use IME. This led to Zed erroneously inserting the `}`
character while removing the first character that triggered IME.
This is still WIP, mostly pending styling. I added a pretty rudimentary
text field and no buttons whatsoever other than that. I am targeting a
Preview of 09.13, as I am gonna be on PTO for the next week.
I dislike the current implementation slightly because of `regex`'s crate
syntax and lack of support of backreferences. What strikes me as odd wrt
to syntax is that it will just replace a capture name with empty string
if that capture is missing from the regex. While this is perfectly fine
behaviour for conditionally-matched capture groups (e.g. `(foo)?`), I
think it should still error out if there's no group with a given name
(conditional or not).
Release Notes:
- Added "Replace" functionality to buffer search.
This should have no user-visible impact.
For vim `.` to repeat it's important that actions are replayable.
Currently editor::MoveDown *sometimes* moves the cursor down, and
*sometimes* selects the next completion.
For replay we need to be able to separate the two.
This changes vim motions to be relative to fold lines, not display
lines, to match the behaviour of vim.
This is necessary for relative line numbers to make sense (as the most
important thing is you can do `3j` to get th e line that is numbered 3).
Release Notes:
- vim: Fix handling of motions when `soft_wrap` is enabled in zed. Like
in vim `j,k,up,down,$,^,0,home,end` will all now navigate in file
coordinates not display coordinates.
- vim: Add `g {j,k,up,down,$,^,0,home,end}` to navigate in display
coordinates.
- vim: Add `z o` and `z c` to open and close folds.
- vim: Add `z f` in visual mode to fold selection.
Note: this may be a jarring change if you're grown used to the current
behaviour of `j` and `k`. You can make the issue less acute by setting
`"soft_wrap":"none"` in your settings; or you can manually copy the
bindings for `g j` to the binding for `j` (etc.) in your keymap.json to
preserve the existing behaviour.
Omit in buffers with one or zero running language servers with the
capability to provide completions
Co-Authored-By: Antonio Scandurra <antonio@zed.dev>
See Linear description for the full explanation of the issue. This PR is
mostly a mechanical change, except for the one case where we do pass in
an explicit `next_id` instead of `model_id` in project.rs.
Release Notes:
- Fixed a bug where some results were not reported in project search in
presence of unnamed buffers.
Kirill Bulatov