Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- N/A or Added/Fixed/Improved ...
---------
Co-authored-by: zed-zippy[bot] <234243425+zed-zippy[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
## Context
The process_tool_use closure used a single chars_read_so_far counter
shared across all REWRITE_SECTION_TOOL_NAME tool use events. When the
LLM produced multiple separate rewrite tool uses (different IDs), the
counter from the first tool use carried over into the second. If the
second tool use had a shorter replacement_text, the slice indexing
panicked with index out of bounds.
(This caused my first ever Zed panic today.)
Fix by tracking bytes-read per tool use ID using a HashMap keyed on
LanguageModelToolUseId. Also replace the direct slice index with .get()
so any remaining out-of-bounds case is handled gracefully instead of
panicking.
Looks like it hasn't been reported yet. At least I couldn't find any
related issues.
## How to Review
I hope the fix is pretty self-explanatory. We keep track of multiple
rewrite tools, which explains the extra ceremony around getting the
right character count, but apart from that it's pretty straightforward.
The performance impact should be neglible because:
1. Once the completion stream ends (or the task is dropped/cancelled),
the entire Arc<Mutex<HashMap>> is freed.
2. The number of entries is tiny. In a single completion request the LLM
will produce at most a handful of
REWRITE_SECTION_TOOL_NAME tool uses. Each entry is just an Arc<str> key
+ usize value.
So the HashMap grows for the duration of one handle_completion call and
is then dropped wholesale.
## Self-Review Checklist
<!-- Check before requesting review: -->
- [X] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [X] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [X] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [X] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [X] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- Fixed an out-of-bounds panic when the AI produced multiple inline
rewrites in a single completion.
TODO:
- [x] merge main
- [x] nonshrinking `set_excerpts_for_path`
- [x] Test-drive potential problem areas in the app
- [x] prepare cloud side
- [x] test collaboration
- [ ] docstrings
- [ ] ???
## Context
### Background
Currently, a multibuffer consists of an arbitrary list of
anchor-delimited excerpts from individual buffers. Excerpt ranges for a
fixed buffer are permitted to overlap, and can appear in any order in
the multibuffer, possibly separated by excerpts from other buffers.
However, in practice all code that constructs multibuffers does so using
the APIs defined in the `path_key` submodule of the `multi_buffer` crate
(`set_excerpts_for_path` etc.) If you only use these APIs, the resulting
multibuffer will maintain the following invariants:
- All excerpts for the same buffer appear contiguously in the
multibuffer
- Excerpts for the same buffer cannot overlap
- Excerpts for the same buffer appear in order
- The placement of the excerpts for a specific buffer in the multibuffer
are determined by the `PathKey` passed to `set_excerpts_for_path`. There
is exactly one `PathKey` per buffer in the multibuffer
### Purpose of this PR
This PR changes the multibuffer so that the invariants maintained by the
`path_key` APIs *always* hold. It's no longer possible to construct a
multibuffer with overlapping excerpts, etc. The APIs that permitted
this, like `insert_excerpts_with_ids_after`, have been removed in favor
of the `path_key` suite.
The main upshot of this is that given a `text::Anchor` and a
multibuffer, it's possible to efficiently figure out the unique excerpt
that includes that anchor, if any:
```
impl MultiBufferSnapshot {
fn buffer_anchor_to_anchor(&self, anchor: text::Anchor) -> Option<multi_buffer::Anchor>;
}
```
And in the other direction, given a `multi_buffer::Anchor`, we can look
at its `text::Anchor` to locate the excerpt that contains it. That means
we don't need an `ExcerptId` to create or resolve
`multi_buffer::Anchor`, and in fact we can delete `ExcerptId` entirely,
so that excerpts no longer have any identity outside their
`Range<text::Anchor>`.
There are a large number of changes to `editor` and other downstream
crates as a result of removing `ExcerptId` and multibuffer APIs that
assumed it.
### Other changes
There are some other improvements that are not immediate consequences of
that big change, but helped make it smoother. Notably:
- The `buffer_id` field of `text::Anchor` is no longer optional.
`text::Anchor::{MIN, MAX}` have been removed in favor of
`min_for_buffer`, etc.
- `multi_buffer::Anchor` is now a three-variant enum (inlined slightly):
```
enum Anchor {
Min,
Excerpt {
text_anchor: text::Anchor,
path_key_index: PathKeyIndex,
diff_base_anchor: Option<text::Anchor>,
},
Max,
}
```
That means it's no longer possible to unconditionally access the
`text_anchor` field, which is good because most of the places that were
doing that were buggy for min/max! Instead, we have a new API that
correctly resolves min/max to the start of the first excerpt or the end
of the last excerpt:
```
impl MultiBufferSnapshot {
fn anchor_to_buffer_anchor(&self, anchor: multi_buffer::Anchor) -> Option<text::Anchor>;
}
```
- `MultiBufferExcerpt` has been removed in favor of a new
`map_excerpt_ranges` API directly on `MultiBufferSnapshot`.
## Self-Review Checklist
<!-- Check before requesting review: -->
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Piotr Osiewicz <24362066+osiewicz@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jakub Konka <kubkon@jakubkonka.com>
Co-authored-by: Conrad <conrad@zed.dev>
A couple of things that this PR wants to accomplish:
* remove dependency on `settings` crate from `language_model`
* refactor provider-specific code into submodules - to be honest, I
would go one step further and put all provider-specific bits in
`language_models` instead but I realise we have cloud logic in
`language_model` which uses those too making it tricky
* move anthropic-specific telemetry into `language_models` crate - I
think it makes more sense for it to be there
Anyhow, I would very appreciate if you could have a look @mikayla-maki
and @maxdeviant and lemme know what you think, if you would tweak
something, etc.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR moves the `CompletionIntent` enum from the `cloud_llm_client`
crate to the `language_model` crate, as it is no longer part of the
Cloud interface.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This is a staff only toggle for now, since the consequences of
activating it are not obvious and quite dire (tokens costs 6 times
more).
Also, persist thinking, thinking effort and fast mode in DbThread so the
thinking mode toggle and thinking effort are persisted.
Release Notes:
- Agent: The thinking mode toggle and thinking effort are now persisted
when selecting a thread from history.
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have:
- [x] Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing
- [x] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects
- [x] Aligned any UI changes with the [UI
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Zed Zippy <234243425+zed-zippy[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
The rate limiter's semaphore guard was being held for the entire
duration of a turn, including during tool execution. This caused
deadlocks when subagents tried to acquire permits while parent requests
were waiting for them to complete.
## The Problem
In `run_turn_internal`, the stream (which contains the `RateLimitGuard`
holding the semaphore permit) was kept alive throughout the entire loop
iteration - including during **tool execution**:
1. Parent request acquires permit
2. Parent starts streaming, consumes response
3. Parent starts executing tools (subagents)
4. **Stream/guard still held** while tools execute
5. Subagents try to acquire permits → blocked because parent still holds
permit
6. Deadlock if all permits are held by parents waiting for subagent
children
## The Fix
Two changes were made:
1. **Drop the stream early**: Added an explicit `drop(events)` after the
stream is fully consumed but before tool execution begins. This releases
the rate limit permit so subagents can acquire it.
2. **Removed the `bypass_rate_limit` workaround**: Since the root cause
is now fixed, the bypass mechanism is no longer needed.
Note: no release notes because subagents are still feature-flagged, and
this rate limiting change isn't actually observable without them.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR implements a UI for the side-by-side diff, using blocks to align
the two sides and adding a coherent `SplitEditorElement`.
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: cameron <cameron.studdstreet@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Anthony Eid <hello@anthonyeid.me>
Co-authored-by: Zed Zippy <234243425+zed-zippy[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
## Problem
When subagents use the `edit_file` tool, it creates an `EditAgent` that
makes its own model request to get the edit instructions. These "nested"
requests compete with the parent subagent conversation requests for rate
limiter permits.
The rate limiter uses a semaphore with a limit of 4 concurrent requests
per model instance. When multiple subagents run in parallel:
1. 3 subagents each hold 1 permit for their ongoing conversation streams
(3 permits used)
2. When all 3 try to use `edit_file` simultaneously, their edit agents
need permits too
3. Only 1 edit agent can get the 4th permit; the other 2 block waiting
4. The blocked edit agents can't complete, so their parent subagent
conversations can't complete
5. The parent conversations hold their permits, so the blocked edit
agents stay blocked
6. **Deadlock**
## Solution
Added a `bypass_rate_limit` field to `LanguageModelRequest`. When set to
`true`, the request skips the rate limiter semaphore entirely. The
`EditAgent` sets this flag because its requests are already "part of" a
rate-limited parent request.
(No release notes because subagents are still feature-flagged.)
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Zed Zippy <234243425+zed-zippy[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Also adjust the code for streaming tool use to always use a
rewrite_section; remove insert_here entirely.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Co-authored-by: Max Brunsfeld <maxbrunsfeld@gmail.com>
Tighten up evals, make assistant less talkative, get them passing a bit
more, improve telemetry, stream in failure messages, and turn it on for
staff.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Gist is we only need to block the foreground thread for reparsing if
immediate language changes are useful to the user. That is usually only
the case when they edit the buffer
Release Notes:
- Improved performance of large project searches and project diffs
Co-authored by: David Kleingeld <david@zed.dev>
Closes#39088
Release Notes:
- Fixed AI assistant edits being scrambled when file was modified while
it was open
--
Co-authored-by: Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com>
This PR introduces a new `MultiBufferOffset` new type wrapping size. The
goal of this is to make it clear at the type level when we are
interacting with offsets of a multi buffer versus offsets of a language
/ text buffer. This improves readability of things quite a bit by making
it clear what kind of offsets one is working with while also reducing
accidental bugs by using the wrong kin of offset for the wrong API.
This PR also uncovered two minor bugs due to that.
Does not yet introduce the MultiBufferPoint equivalent, that is for a
follow up PR.
Release Notes:
- N/A *or* Added/Fixed/Improved ...
Extracts and cleans up GPUI's scheduler code into a new `scheduler`
crate, making it pluggable by external runtimes. This will enable
deterministic integration testing with cloud components by providing a
unified test scheduler across Zed and backend code. In Zed, it will
replace the existing GPUI scheduler for consistent async task management
across platforms.
## Changes
- **Core Implementation**: `TestScheduler` with seed-based
randomization, session tracking (`SessionId`), and foreground/background
task separation for reproducible testing.
- **Executors**: `ForegroundExecutor` (!Send, thread-local) and
`BackgroundExecutor` (Send, with blocking/timeout support) as
GPUI-compatible wrappers.
- **Clock and Timer**: Controllable `TestClock` and future-based `Timer`
for time-sensitive tests.
- **Testing APIs**: `once()`, `with_seed()`, and `many()` methods for
configurable test runs.
- **Dependencies**: Added `async-task`, `chrono`, `futures`, etc., with
updates to `Cargo.toml` and lock file.
## Benefits
- **Integration Testing**: Facilitates reliable async tests involving
cloud sessions, reducing flakiness via deterministic execution.
- **Pluggability**: Trait-based design (`Scheduler`) allows easy
integration into non-GPUI runtimes while maintaining GPUI compatibility.
- **Cleanup**: Refactors GPUI scheduler logic for clarity, correctness
(no `unwrap()`, proper error handling), and extensibility.
Follows Rust guidelines; run `./script/clippy` for verification.
- [x] Define and test a core scheduler that we think can power our cloud
code and GPUI
- [ ] Replace GPUI's scheduler
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Antonio Scandurra <me@as-cii.com>
This removes around 900 unnecessary clones, ranging from cloning a few
ints all the way to large data structures and images.
A lot of these were fixed using `cargo clippy --fix --workspace
--all-targets`, however it often breaks other lints and needs to be run
again. This was then followed up with some manual fixing.
I understand this is a large diff, but all the changes are pretty
trivial. Rust is doing some heavy lifting here for us. Once I get it up
to speed with main, I'd appreciate this getting merged rather sooner
than later.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This introduces a new field `thinking_allowed` on `LanguageModelRequest`
which lets us control whether thinking should be enabled if the model
supports it.
We permit thinking in the Inline Assistant, Edit File tool and the Git
Commit message generator, this should make generation faster when using
a thinking model, e.g. `claude-sonnet-4-thinking`
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR moves the UI-dependent logic in the `agent` crate into its own
crate, `agent_ui`. The remaining `agent` crate no longer depends on
`editor`, `picker`, `ui`, `workspace`, etc.
This has compile time benefits, but the main motivation is to isolate
our core agentic logic, so that we can make agents more
pluggable/configurable.
Release Notes:
- N/A
