The workflow run at
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/actions/runs/23557683707 succeeded
but threw some warnings for a rather-soon Node.js 20 deprecation (June
2nd).
Hence, this PR updates in that context mentioned workflows to newer
versions from which on the actions will use Node.js 24.
Namely, this updates
- `actions/checkout`
- `actions/create-github-app-token` and
- `peter-evans/create-pull-request`
to their latest version which includes said updates. As for their most
recent versions, all of these actions just updated their versions to
account for said deprecation.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Closes#51339
This should address issues with too new libstdc++.so on older/more
conservative distros such as RHEL9.
Release Notes:
- Relaxed requirement for libstdc++.so available on Linux distros.
This will allow us to also use the workflows for this repository, which
will especially come in handy once we revisit provider extensions.
Not perfect, as we will trigger some failed workflows for extensions
that were just added
Release Notes:
- N/A
This wil help with releases for extensions living this repository, which
will become more relevant once agent provider extensions are back on the
table.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Follow-up to https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/50138
I deliberately decided against adding this in a separete job because
ts_query_ls is very fast when it comes to both formatting these as well
as checking for proper formatting. Will see here how long it takes to
install and whether we might need to adjust to account for the
installation time.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Implements a basic web platform for the wasm32-unknown-unknown target
for gpui
Release Notes:
- N/A *or* Added/Fixed/Improved ...
---------
Co-authored-by: John Tur <john-tur@outlook.com>
The failure in #49661 was caused by a broken pipe, which then led to
tests not being ran.
Co-authored-by: Marshall Bowers <marshall@zed.dev>
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have:
- [ ] Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing
- [ ] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects
- [ ] Aligned any UI changes with the [UI
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
Release Notes:
- N/A
Co-authored-by: Marshall Bowers <marshall@zed.dev>
We need more fetch depth here for the check, hence bumping this.
Also does a drive-by cleanup of the checkout step within xtask to make
this (hopefully) more intuitive to use.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Although this introduces a small possiblity that we will regress the nix
build,
the existing check is very slow and fails very rarely.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Reverts zed-industries/zed#48607
The problem we've ran into is that CI started reusing already-cached
runs from newer branches (that did not have that change pulled in).
Yet this unveiled another potential issue, which is that relying on
mtime might make it so that an artifact for a different (newer) commit
would be reused by an unrelated run of CI.
The answer is: checksum-based-freshness.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Finn found out the hard way that the new cool tech does not quite work
at times. Back to the drawing board we go (at least partially).
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- N/A
GitHub allows defining a default shell for all jobs on the workflow
level, which we did not use before, yet practically did when it comes
down to our usage of `named::bash`. Since this makes stuff quite
verbose, I decided on using the defaults instead so the workflows become
somewhat easier to audit when reading the generated files.
Powershell steps continue to use Powershell, only the default for bash
scripts was modified.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Closes #ISSUE
Uses the existing `--dump-all-actions` arg on the Zed binary to generate
an asset of all of our actions so that the `docs_preprocessor` can
injest it, rather than depending on the Zed crate itself to collect all
action names
Release Notes:
- N/A *or* Added/Fixed/Improved ...
---------
Co-authored-by: Zed Zippy <234243425+zed-zippy[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This reverts #39643, effectively
For the record, @SomeoneToIgnore found it quite cumbersome to scroll
through logs just to see which tests have failed. I kinda see the
argument. At the same time, I wish nextest could do both: it could
aggregate logs of failed tests and then print out the summary.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This starts the work on a workflow that can be invoked in extension CI
to test changes on extension repositories.
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Agus Zubiaga <agus@zed.dev>
Co-authored-by: Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com>
