Updates Collab to use the new `/internal/channel_members/fuzzy_search`
endpoint that searches users by username (instead of GitHub login).
Request and response shapes are the same.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR adds the new `id_v2` and `legacy_user_id` fields to the
`AuthenticatedUser` type and starts using them in place of the `id`
field.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Summary
- Track whether a worktree root is itself a linked Git worktree.
- Use that metadata when computing project group keys so bare checkout
worktrees group under the repository identity path.
- Propagate the metadata through remote worktree protocols and add
local/remote regression coverage.
Background
Bare checkout layouts can place linked worktrees under the repository
identity directory, e.g. `/monty/.bare` with worktrees like
`/monty/feature-a`. We were treating those linked worktree paths as
separate project identities, which caused the sidebar to move agent
threads under the active worktree instead of the shared repository
group.
We also exclude adding this to collab intentionally, we can open a
different PR for that if we need to.
Closes#59910
Closes AI-431
Test Plan
- `cargo fmt --package project --package worktree --package
remote_server --package workspace --package collab --package proto`
- `git --no-pager diff --check`
- `cargo test -p project test_project_group_key -- --nocapture`
- `cargo test -p remote_server test_remote_root_repo_common_dir --
--nocapture`
- `cargo test -p worktree remote_worktree -- --nocapture`
- `cargo test -p workspace
test_remote_project_root_dir_changes_update_groups -- --nocapture`
- `cargo check -p collab`
Self-Review Checklist:
I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
Tests cover the new/changed behavior
Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- Fixed agent thread/sidebar grouping for Git worktrees backed by bare
checkouts.
---------
Co-authored-by: Anthony Eid <anthony@zed.dev>
This PR unships shared threads.
The feature is not used much and is getting in the way, at this point.
These are only ever made available to staff.
The corresponding database schema migration has been created in the
Cloud repo and applied to the production database.
Release Notes:
- N/A
- **Revert "livekit: Preserve tokens on channel rejoin (#59388)"**
- **Revert "call: Log LiveKit connection info refresh outcomes in retry
loop (#59205)"**
- **Revert "audio: Fix phantom presence in channels (#59195)"**
- **proto: Reserve RejoinRoomResponse field 4 after revert**
We've observed a spike of phantom collaborator issues after this fixes.
This sucks and I'm quite unhappy about it.
# Objective
- Describe the objective or issue this PR addresses.
- If you're fixing a specific issue, use "Fixes #X" for each issue as
[described in the GitHub
docs](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/using-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword).
## Solution
- Describe the solution used to achieve the objective above.
## Testing
- Did you test these changes? If so, how?
- Are there any parts that need more testing?
- How can other people (reviewers) test your changes? Is there anything
specific they need to know?
- If relevant, what platforms did you test these changes on, and are
there any important ones you can't test?
## Self-Review Checklist:
- [ ] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [ ] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [ ] The content adheres to Zed's UI standards
([UX/UI](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
and
[icon](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/crates/icons/README.md)
guidelines)
- [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [ ] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
## Showcase
> This section is optional. If this PR does not include a visual change
or does not add a new user-facing feature, you can delete this section.
- Help others understand the result of this PR by showcasing your
awesome work!
- If this PR includes a visual change, consider adding a screenshot,
GIF, or video
- A before/after comparison is very useful for changes to existing
features!
While a showcase should aim to be brief and digestible, you can use a
toggleable section to save space on longer showcases:
<details>
<summary>Click to view showcase</summary>
My super cool demos here
</details>
---
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This fixes archive cleanup for agent threads so Zed only removes
worktrees it explicitly created, rather than treating every linked
worktree under the configured managed directory as safe to delete. When
Zed creates a worktree, it now records it in the local database along
with the creation time of the worktree's git metadata directory
(`.git/worktrees/<name>/`). Archive planning requires that record, and
right before deleting anything, Zed re-stats the directory and compares
creation times: if the worktree was removed and recreated outside Zed
(or the time can't be read at all), deletion is skipped and the stale
record is dropped. Every failure mode fails safe by leaving the
directory untouched.
For remote (SSH) projects, the stat runs on the remote host via a new
`GitWorktreeCreatedAt` request. Worktrees created by a different Zed
install (another release channel, or another machine connecting to the
same host) have no record in the local database and are therefore never
auto-archived, which is the intended conservative behavior.
Closes https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/57155
Closes AI-352
Release Notes:
- Fixed archiving an agent thread incorrectly deleting manually-created
git worktrees.
- **collab: Don't revoke LiveKit token when rejoining the same channel**
- **call: Bound LiveKit reconnect attempts and decouple from collab
rejoin**
# Objective
- Describe the objective or issue this PR addresses.
- If you're fixing a specific issue, use "Fixes #X" for each issue as
[described in the GitHub
docs](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/using-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword).
## Solution
- Describe the solution used to achieve the objective above.
## Testing
- Did you test these changes? If so, how?
- Are there any parts that need more testing?
- How can other people (reviewers) test your changes? Is there anything
specific they need to know?
- If relevant, what platforms did you test these changes on, and are
there any important ones you can't test?
## Self-Review Checklist:
- [ ] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [ ] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [ ] The content adheres to Zed's UI standards
([UX/UI](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
and
[icon](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/crates/icons/README.md)
guidelines)
- [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [ ] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
## Showcase
> This section is optional. If this PR does not include a visual change
or does not add a new user-facing feature, you can delete this section.
- Help others understand the result of this PR by showcasing your
awesome work!
- If this PR includes a visual change, consider adding a screenshot,
GIF, or video
- A before/after comparison is very useful for changes to existing
features!
While a showcase should aim to be brief and digestible, you can use a
toggleable section to save space on longer showcases:
<details>
<summary>Click to view showcase</summary>
My super cool demos here
</details>
---
Release Notes:
- N/A or Added/Fixed/Improved ...
# Objective
You know that feeling? You join the channel, crack a banger joke to
break the ice - yet, nobody laughs. Worse yet, you're swarmed with Slack
messages like "Piotr, we can't hear you". After a while you realize that
maybe it's for the best as the joke was not as good as you've initially
thought, but still: it's possible to get into a state where other
participants see you as muted. You don't hear anybody. Bummer.
That's what happened when we were hoping to pair with @dinocosta today.
I could not hear him. However, he had some logs to share which indicated
that while collab thought he's in the room with me, live-kit was
rejecting his token as it was revoked.
What clanker helped us figure out is that there's a race-y code path
where if you disconnect from a given room abruptly, collab can put you
in a limbo.
<details><summary>Clanker's idea of what's going on</summary>
<p>
Found the whole story. Here's what those logs mean and where the bug
surface is.
What's happening
The error at room.rs:1809 is the detach_and_log_err on the task spawned
by spawn_room_connection (crates/call/src/call_impl/room.rs:1754-1810).
So this is the initial livekit::Room::connect call failing — the LiveKit
SDK internally retried 3 times (that's the retrying... (1/3) lines), got
401 invalid token: revoked every time, gave up, and the error propagated
out of the ? at line 1762 and was logged-and-dropped.
The "revoked" comes from the collab server: leave_room_for_session
(crates/collab/src/rpc.rs:4091-4095) calls
live_kit.remove_participant(livekit_room,
session.user_id().to_string()), and LiveKit Cloud treats a removed
participant's token as revoked. Crucially, the LiveKit identity is just
the user id, not the connection id, while the DB-side
leave_room(connection_id) is per-connection. leave_room_for_session
fires from three places:
1. Explicit leave (rpc.rs:1666)
2. connection_lost, after RECONNECT_TIMEOUT expires (rpc.rs:1342)
3. Stale-connection cleanup when re-joining a channel (rpc.rs:3401)
So there's a race: an old connection's delayed cleanup (path 2) can fire
after the same user has rejoined the room on a new connection and been
issued a fresh token — and remove_participant(room, user_id)
kicks/revokes the user's current LiveKit participant, because the
identity is shared across connections. Quick restart of Zed, two
instances, or a reconnect that straddles the server's RECONNECT_TIMEOUT
all set this up.
Client-side consequences (this connects to your first question)
When that initial connect fails:
- this.live_kit stays None and this.diagnostics is never created — lines
1780-1791 only run on success. So in this failure mode CallDiagnostics
doesn't exist at all; the "stats never overridden" path I described
earlier isn't even reached.
- There is no retry and no token refresh. The failure is
detach_and_log_err'd and that's the end of it. The user stays in the
room at the collab level (status is still Online, they appear in the
channel), but with no audio and no way to recover short of leaving and
rejoining.
- Even a collab-level reconnect doesn't help: RejoinRoomResponse
(crates/proto/proto/call.proto:58) carries no live_kit_connection_info,
and rejoin() never calls spawn_room_connection — the LiveKit connection
is established exactly once, in Room::new, with the token from the
original join response.
So the user-visible symptom is: you're "in" the call, everyone sees you,
but you can't hear or be heard, and there's no error surfaced in the UI
— just this log line.
If you want to fix it, the two angles are server-side (make
leave_room_for_session skip the LiveKit removal when the user still has
a live connection in that room, or scope LiveKit identities
per-connection) and client-side (treat a failed spawn_room_connection as
fatal-but-recoverable: surface it, and have rejoin request fresh
connection info instead of silently carrying on). Happy to dig into
either if you want.
</p>
</details>
So tl;dr: our token was swapped out underneath us. One way to "fix" it
was to just go into another channel, but that was a bummer.
We have a good and reliable repro for it though: `kill -9 $ZED_PID`
followed by an attempt to rejoin the same channel within 30s would
consistently put us in that state.
Put another way: you panic and thus do not send a clean "leave room"
message to LK. if you rejoin the channel within 30s (after restarting),
LK will invalidate the very token you're attempting to use (as it cleans
up old tokens).
It may also happen without crashing, but that's the most reliable way to
repro the issue. Long story short your LK token gets tainted and you
can't share the audio anyhow.
## Solution
The fix is both client and server-side.
On client's side, we now retry the reconnection with a back-off and we
grab a fresh token off of reconnect attempts.
On server's side, we share the current token on room reconnect attempts.
We've also tweaked the call diagnostics to not use `unwrap_or_default`
so much: it was hard for us to tell that we're in a totally bogus state
and we've only reached that conclusion based on source code analysis. We
now show some generic "ok you're in a borked state pls report a bug"
message instead.
## Testing
We added tests that present the flacky scenario. We've also tried to
setup an infra to test the new behaviour, but sadly, local LK instance
seems to revoke tokens more leniently than the prod..
OTOH, we are quite confident that once new collab is deployed, we'll be
able to mince the new tokens and life is going to be good. Even when
running against the current prod instance we could see that our code
changed the behaviour for the better, as now we'll actually try to use a
new token if one is provided by collab. For that to happen we need to
redeploy though.
## Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content adheres to Zed's UI standards
([UX/UI](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
and
[icon](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/crates/icons/README.md)
guidelines)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- Fixed a race condition that caused collab users to not receive/send
any audio to their peers.
---------
Co-authored-by: dino <dinojoaocosta@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dino <dino@zed.dev>
Co-authored-by: zed-zippy[bot] <234243425+zed-zippy[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
TypeId is effectively already a hash, so re-hashing it with fxhash is
unnecessary.
Release Notes:
- N/A or Added/Fixed/Improved ...
---------
Co-authored-by: zed-zippy[bot] <234243425+zed-zippy[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR removes writes to the `github_user_id` and `github_login`
columns on the `users` table.
These writes were only being done in tests, as the production codepaths
that referenced these columns have already been removed.
Depends on https://github.com/zed-industries/cloud/pull/2743 to make the
`github_user_id` column nullable.
The corresponding database schema migration has been created in the
Cloud repo and applied to the production database.
Closes CLO-831.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR marks the `github_user_id` and `github_login` columns on the
`User` database model as only being accessible in tests.
Closes CLO-829.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes#49178
The context for this change is covered in #49178. Some language server
adapters are lazily registered; in remote development or collab
sessions, the local client fails to register these adapters, may causing
certain LSP features to function incorrectly. This PR is intended to
address that.
Release Notes:
- N/A
cc @cole-miller
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- Fixed branch enumeration when a broken Git ref prevents commit
metadata from being read.
---------
Co-authored-by: Cole Miller <cole@zed.dev>
This PR removes some more unused fields from the database user model:
- `github_user_created_at`
- `email_address`
- `name`
- `created_at`
These fields were not being used anywhere, and are nullable/defaulted in
the database in tests.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR removes the seeding infrastructure from Collab.
We're already set up to just-in-time create users in local development
through Cloud.
Also updated the liveness probe for the health endpoint to use a
different query.
Closes CLO-763.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR removes the database access in the `Authorization` header
verification in Collab.
We already have the user returned from the call to Cloud, but were just
fetching the user from the database to get some additional fields.
We're now returning the additional fields we need from Cloud, so we can
just convert the user from the internal API response into a `User`
entity.
Closes CLO-762.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Adds streaming RPC forwarding to collab so guests can call
`GetInitialGraphData` and `SearchCommits` against a remote host project.
Previously these requests had no forwarder registered on the server and
would fail when invoked by a guest.
This mirrors the existing single-response forwarding pattern with new
analogues:
- `StreamResponse<R>` + `MessageContext::forward_request_stream`
- `Server::add_request_stream_handler`
- `forward_read_only_project_stream_request`, registered for both
messages
Also hardens both the unary and stream handlers to send
`respond_with_error` when a handler returns `Ok` without sending/ending
a response, so the client doesn't hang waiting for a reply that will
never arrive.
I added git graph collab integration tests for this as well.
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes#55954
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR replaces the `TransitionalUserService` with the
`CloudUserService`, as all of the calls are now all going through Cloud.
This allows us to delete the `TransitionalUserService`, the
`DatabaseUserService`, as well as the backing database queries that are
no longer used.
Closes CLO-758.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR makes it so we route the `UserService::search_channel_members`
call through Cloud instead of hitting the database.
This is the last of the calls to be routed through Cloud. We'll clean up
the old database-backed implementations in a follow-up PR.
Closes CLO-746.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR makes it so we route the `UserService::fuzzy_search_users` call
through Cloud instead of hitting the database.
Closes CLO-745.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR makes it so we route the `UserService::get_user_by_github_login`
call through Cloud instead of hitting the database.
Closes CLO-743.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR makes it so we route the `UserService::get_users_by_ids` call
through Cloud instead of hitting the database.
We've introduced a new `CloudUserService` that will fetch the users from
Cloud using the internal API. Note that we've only implemented the
`get_users_by_ids` method on this service, as the endpoints for the
other methods don't yet exist.
We have also introduced a `TransitionalUserService` for the purposes of
gradually transitioning these calls over to Cloud. Right now it uses the
`CloudUserService` for the `get_users_by_ids` implementation, but then
uses the `DatabaseUserService` for the other methods.
Closes CLO-740.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR introduces a `UserService` trait to Collab.
This is a step towards moving Collab away from reading user information
directly from the database.
We currently have two implementations for the trait:
- The `DatabaseUserService`, which leverages the existing query methods
to talk to the database
- The `FakeUserService`, which will be used in tests
Once we're ready, we'll be able to replace the `DatabaseUserService`
with a `CloudUserService` to fetch the users from Cloud.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR updates the `get_channel_participant_details` method to reduce
the mixing of concerns within the method.
The authorization check for the caller has been moved to the outside,
along with the conversions from the database representations to the RPC
proto representations.
Now the method is just responsible for dealing with the data fetching,
which will make it easier to swap out.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR updates the `test_channel_requires_zed_cla` test to simplify the
setup for denoting that a user has signed the CLA.
Since the user already exists in the database, we can just create the
corresponding record without needing to worry about upserting.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR decouples the session principal in Collab from the `User`
database model.
We have introduced a new `User` domain entity that we use for the
principal. Currently we just construct it from the database model, but
this separation will make it easier to remove reliance on reading the
database directly soon.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Fixes https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/54830
This fixes a bugs where
* when there's no main worktree, we treated the first linked worktree as
main
* the titlebar and sidebar showed two different things when opening a
linked wortree directly
When there's no main worktree, our "project group key" will be the bare
repo path. For displaying this to the user, we try to present something
meaningful:
* If the bare repo is `foo.git`, we'll say "foo"
* If the bare repo is "bar/.bare", we'll "bar"
Release Notes:
- Fixed bugs in Zed's sidebar and titlebar when editing in git worktrees
created from bare repositories.
This sends `branch_list` in live `UpdateRepository` messages so
downstream repository snapshots stay in sync and the remote branch
picker can populate correctly. Collab DB replay for join/reconnect will
follow in a separate change.
This fixes a bug where the branch picker wouldn't show any branches in
remote environments
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes#54530
Release Notes:
- git: Fix remote branch picker not showing any branches
### Motivation
To support remote Git graph usage, we need remote support for the Git
APIs that the graph depends on. This PR adds remote support for
`CommitDataHandler` (the `git cat-file --batch` process manager),
allowing remote Git graph consumers to fetch visible commit data without
polling.
#### Summary
The Git graph separates the UI and data layers so the UI can continue
rendering while commit data is fetched in the background. This change
extends that model to remote repositories by allowing
`GitStore::fetch_commit_data(sha: Oid, await_result: bool, cx: &mut
Context) -> &CommitDataState` to await remote commit loading.
For simplicity, the `Starting` variant was removed from
`CommitDataState`. `CommitDataState::Loading(Option<...>)` now stores
`Some(...)` when `await_result == true` is passed to
`fetch_commit_data`. This allows the data layer to await commit loading
without polling, and only when explicitly requested.
I also removed the `Graph` prefix from `CommitData`-related types
because this API is general-purpose and not limited to the graph. Longer
term, I hope to replace `Repository::show` with the commit data
functionality, since it already provides built-in caching.
#### Bug Fixes
- Fix stale `Loading(...)` entries that survive enqueue failure or
handler shutdown.
- Fix commit data handler bookkeeping so `pending_requests`,
`completion_senders`, and `CommitDataState` remain consistent.
- Fix remote commit-data loading so the data layer can await results
instead of polling.
#### Testing
- Add property tests for commit data fetching.
- Add a collab integration test that verifies batched remote commit-data
fetching.
#### Follow Up
In a follow-up, I want to replace the `Repository::show` backend with
the commit data handler and remove `CommitDetails` from the codebase as
a cleanup and maintenance pass. The commit data handler already provides
caching and is a better long-term path for commit metadata access.
I may also want to allow the `CommitData` type to propagate errors to
callers.
For the Git graph, the remaining work is remote search and initial data
fetching.
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Remco Smits <djsmits12@gmail.com>
### Summary
This PR implements remote support for git store operations that the
sidebar's archive thread checkpoint/restore featured relied on. This was
the second to last blocker for remote usage of this feature.
I also made a shared backend between `update_ref` and `delete_ref`
called `edit_ref` because they run the same git command and this allowed
for some code unification.
#### Remote Git Operations
- `Repository::update_ref`
- `Repository::delete_ref`
- `Repository::repair_worktrees`
- `Repository::create_archive_checkpoint`
- `Repository::restore_archive_checkpoint`
#### Follow up
`agent_ui::thread_worktree_archive::find_or_create_repository` needs to
be made aware of the remote machine that the repository it's searching
for is on. Once that is completed, we can get the correct repo when
archiving a remote thread and the flow should work without any problems.
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR greatly improves our handling of remote threads in the sidebar.
One primary issue was that many parts of the sidebar were only looking
at a thread's path list and not its remote connection information. The
fix here is to use `ProjectGroupKey` more consistently throughout the
sidebar which also includes remote connection information.
The second major change is to extend the MultiWorkspace with the ability
to initiate the creation of remote workspaces when needed. This involved
refactoring a lot of our remote workspace creation paths to share a
single code path for better consistency.
Release Notes:
- (Preview only) Fixed remote project threads appearing as a separate
local project in the sidebar
---------
Co-authored-by: Anthony Eid <anthony@zed.dev>
Co-authored-by: Anthony Eid <hello@anthonyeid.me>
Co-authored-by: Max Brunsfeld <maxbrunsfeld@gmail.com>
Extend the git API with several new capabilities needed for worktree
archival and restoration:
- Add `allow_empty` flag to `CommitOptions` for creating WIP marker
commits
- Change `create_worktree` to accept `Option<String>` branch, enabling
detached worktree creation when `None` is passed
- Add `head_sha()` to read the current HEAD commit hash
- Add `update_ref()` and `delete_ref()` for managing git references
- Add `stage_all_including_untracked()` to stage everything before a WIP
commit
- Implement all new operations in `FakeGitRepository` with functional
commit history tracking, reset support, and ref management
- Update existing call sites for the new `CommitOptions` field and
`create_worktree` signature
Part 1 of 3 in the persist-worktree stack. These are nonbreaking API
additions with no behavioral changes to existing code.
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Anthony Eid <anthony@zed.dev>
TODO:
- [x] merge main
- [x] nonshrinking `set_excerpts_for_path`
- [x] Test-drive potential problem areas in the app
- [x] prepare cloud side
- [x] test collaboration
- [ ] docstrings
- [ ] ???
## Context
### Background
Currently, a multibuffer consists of an arbitrary list of
anchor-delimited excerpts from individual buffers. Excerpt ranges for a
fixed buffer are permitted to overlap, and can appear in any order in
the multibuffer, possibly separated by excerpts from other buffers.
However, in practice all code that constructs multibuffers does so using
the APIs defined in the `path_key` submodule of the `multi_buffer` crate
(`set_excerpts_for_path` etc.) If you only use these APIs, the resulting
multibuffer will maintain the following invariants:
- All excerpts for the same buffer appear contiguously in the
multibuffer
- Excerpts for the same buffer cannot overlap
- Excerpts for the same buffer appear in order
- The placement of the excerpts for a specific buffer in the multibuffer
are determined by the `PathKey` passed to `set_excerpts_for_path`. There
is exactly one `PathKey` per buffer in the multibuffer
### Purpose of this PR
This PR changes the multibuffer so that the invariants maintained by the
`path_key` APIs *always* hold. It's no longer possible to construct a
multibuffer with overlapping excerpts, etc. The APIs that permitted
this, like `insert_excerpts_with_ids_after`, have been removed in favor
of the `path_key` suite.
The main upshot of this is that given a `text::Anchor` and a
multibuffer, it's possible to efficiently figure out the unique excerpt
that includes that anchor, if any:
```
impl MultiBufferSnapshot {
fn buffer_anchor_to_anchor(&self, anchor: text::Anchor) -> Option<multi_buffer::Anchor>;
}
```
And in the other direction, given a `multi_buffer::Anchor`, we can look
at its `text::Anchor` to locate the excerpt that contains it. That means
we don't need an `ExcerptId` to create or resolve
`multi_buffer::Anchor`, and in fact we can delete `ExcerptId` entirely,
so that excerpts no longer have any identity outside their
`Range<text::Anchor>`.
There are a large number of changes to `editor` and other downstream
crates as a result of removing `ExcerptId` and multibuffer APIs that
assumed it.
### Other changes
There are some other improvements that are not immediate consequences of
that big change, but helped make it smoother. Notably:
- The `buffer_id` field of `text::Anchor` is no longer optional.
`text::Anchor::{MIN, MAX}` have been removed in favor of
`min_for_buffer`, etc.
- `multi_buffer::Anchor` is now a three-variant enum (inlined slightly):
```
enum Anchor {
Min,
Excerpt {
text_anchor: text::Anchor,
path_key_index: PathKeyIndex,
diff_base_anchor: Option<text::Anchor>,
},
Max,
}
```
That means it's no longer possible to unconditionally access the
`text_anchor` field, which is good because most of the places that were
doing that were buggy for min/max! Instead, we have a new API that
correctly resolves min/max to the start of the first excerpt or the end
of the last excerpt:
```
impl MultiBufferSnapshot {
fn anchor_to_buffer_anchor(&self, anchor: multi_buffer::Anchor) -> Option<text::Anchor>;
}
```
- `MultiBufferExcerpt` has been removed in favor of a new
`map_excerpt_ranges` API directly on `MultiBufferSnapshot`.
## Self-Review Checklist
<!-- Check before requesting review: -->
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Piotr Osiewicz <24362066+osiewicz@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jakub Konka <kubkon@jakubkonka.com>
Co-authored-by: Conrad <conrad@zed.dev>
🫡
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- Removed legacy Text Threads feature to help streamline the new agentic
workflows in Zed. Thanks to all of you who were enthusiastic Text Thread
users over the years ❤️!
---------
Co-authored-by: Bennet Bo Fenner <bennetbo@gmx.de>
Implements worktree support for the agent panel sidebar
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have:
- [x] Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing
- [x] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects
- [x] Aligned any UI changes with the [UI
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
Release Notes:
- N/A
This should be the last step in implementing full git worktree support
in the `GitStore`. We still need to add UI for that allows a user to
rename a git worktree and, by extension git branches if we use the git
picker to do so.
Also, I added a helper function called `disallow_guest_request::<T>` to
the `Collab::rpc` that is used to specify a proto request isn't allowed
to be sent by a guest. This enabled me to add a regression test that
checks that a guest isn't allowed to delete a git worktree, without the
test hanging forever because it's waiting for the proto server to
respond.
Since SSH connections send the proto message directly from client to
remote host, this won't affect those requests.
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have:
- [x] Added solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing
- [x] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects
- [ ] Aligned any UI changes with the [UI
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
Release Notes:
- git: Add SSH support for removing git worktrees
Follow up on: https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/49519
This PR reworks how Zed calculates diff num stats by moving the
calculation to the `RepositorySnapshot` layer, instead of the
`GitPanel`. This has a couple of benefits:
1. Snapshot recalculations are already set up to recompute on file
system changes and only update the affected files. This means that diff
stats don't need to manage their own subscription or states anymore like
they did in the original PR.
2. We're able to further separate the data layer from the UI. Before,
the git panel owned all the subscriptions and tasks that refreshed the
diff stat, now the repository does, which is more inline with the code
base.
3. Integration tests are cleaner because `FakeRepository` can handle all
the data and calculations of diff stat and make it accessible to more
tests in the codebase. Because a lot of tests wouldn't initialize the
git panel when they used the git repository.
4. This made implementing remote/collab support for this feature
streamline. Remote clients wouldn't get the same buffer events as local
clients, so they wouldn't know that the diff stat state has been updated
and invalidate their data.
5. File system changes that happened outside of Zed now trigger the diff
stat refresh because we're using the `RepositorySnapshot`.
I added some integration tests as well to make sure collab support is
working this time. Finally, adding the initial diff calculation to
`compute_snapshot` didn't affect performance for me when checking
against chromium's diff with HEAD~1000. So this should be a safe change
to make.
I decided to add diff stats on the status entry struct because it made
updating changed paths and the collab database much simpler than having
two separate SumTrees. Also whenever the UI got a file's status it would
check its diff stat as well, so this change makes that code more
streamlined as well.
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have:
- [x] Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing.
- [x] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects.
Release Notes:
- N/A
The main issue is that we weren't forwarding the proto messages through
the collab server to the host. After fixing that I added integration
tests to cover local worktrees, remote worktrees, and ssh worktrees.
I also fixed a bug with FakeRepository where it wouldn't name its
current branch as a worktree when calling git worktree, which doesn't
match the behavior of the git binary.
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have:
- [x] Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing
- [x] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects
Release Notes:
- git: Fix bug that caused the git worktree picker from displaying and
creating worktrees over collab
