I noticed that our line deletion actions are inconsistent. For `DeleteToBeginningOfLine`: - `one «two threeˇ» four` -> ` four` ✅ - `one «ˇtwo three» four` -> ` four` ✅ Great, these have the same results, regardless of selection direction. For `DeleteToEndOfLine`: - `one «two threeˇ» four` -> ` one ` ✅ - `one «ˇtwo three» four` -> `one two three` ❌ Whoops, that second one should be the same, assuming that selection direction again shouldn't matter, as in the case of `DeleteToBeginningOfLine`. The same issue exists for `CutToEndOfLine`: - `The quick «brownˇ» fox` -> `The quick ` ✅ - `The quick «ˇbrown» fox` -> `The quick brown` ❌ I unified the end-of-line actions to match `DeleteToBeginningOfLine`: selection direction no longer matters, so the whole selection is always included. --- - [X] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability - [X] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments - [X] The content adheres to Zed's UI standards ([UX/UI](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist) and [icon](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/crates/icons/README.md) guidelines) - [X] Tests cover the new/changed behavior - [X] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable Release Notes: - Fixed `editor: delete to end of line` to behave consistently regardless of selection direction. - Fixed `editor: cut to end of line` to behave consistently regardless of selection direction.
Zed
Welcome to Zed, a high-performance, multiplayer code editor from the creators of Atom and Tree-sitter.
Installation
On macOS, Linux, and Windows you can download Zed directly or install Zed via your local package manager (macOS/Linux/Windows).
Other platforms are not yet available:
- Web (tracking discussion)
Developing Zed
Contributing
See CONTRIBUTING.md for ways you can contribute to Zed.
Also... we're hiring! Check out our jobs page for open roles.
Licensing
Zed source code is licensed primarily under GPL-3.0-or-later, with Apache-2.0 components where marked.
License information for third party dependencies must be correctly provided for CI to pass.
We use cargo-about to automatically comply with open source licenses. If CI is failing, check the following:
- Is it showing a
no license specifiederror for a crate you've created? If so, addpublish = falseunder[package]in your crate's Cargo.toml. - Is the error
failed to satisfy license requirementsfor a dependency? If so, first determine what license the project has and whether this system is sufficient to comply with this license's requirements. If you're unsure, ask a lawyer. Once you've verified that this system is acceptable add the license's SPDX identifier to theacceptedarray inscript/licenses/zed-licenses.toml. - Is
cargo-aboutunable to find the license for a dependency? If so, add a clarification field at the end ofscript/licenses/zed-licenses.toml, as specified in the cargo-about book.
Sponsorship
Zed is developed by Zed Industries, Inc., a for-profit company.
If you’d like to financially support the project, you can do so via GitHub Sponsors. Sponsorships go directly to Zed Industries and are used as general company revenue. There are no perks or entitlements associated with sponsorship.
- me: do a nixos integration test (using KVM)
- agent: i need to turn off the sandbox
- me: "allow for this thread"
- agent: runs the tests unsandboxed
- me: use the terminal to ls this directory
- agent: runs
lssandboxed