SerophotsandAntonio Scandurra 8e7a0c8494 gpui: Make refining a Style properly refine the TextStyle (#42852)
## Motivating problem
The gpui API currently has this counter intuitive behaviour

```rust
 div()
            .id("hallo")
            .cursor_pointer()
            .text_color(white())
            .font_weight(FontWeight::SEMIBOLD)
            .text_size(px(20.0))
            .child("hallo")
            .active(|this| this.text_color(red()))
```
By changing the text_color when the div is active, the current behaviour
is to overwrite all of the text styling rather than do a proper
refinement of the existing text styling leading to this odd result:
The button being active inadvertently changes the font size.


https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1ff51169-0d76-4ee5-bbb0-004eb9ffdf2c



## Solution
Previously refining a Style would not recursively refine the TextStyle
inside of it, leading to this behaviour:
```rust
let mut style = Style::default();
style.refine(&StyleRefinement::default().text_size(px(20.0)));
style.refine(&StyleRefinement::default().font_weight(FontWeight::SEMIBOLD));

assert!(style.text_style().unwrap().font_size.is_none());
//assertion passes
```

(As best as I can tell) Style deliberately has `pub text:
TextStyleRefinement` storing the `TextStyleRefinement` rather than the
absolute `TextStyle` so that these refinements can be elsewhere used in
cascading text styles down to element's children. But a consequence of
that is that the refine macro was not properly recursively refining the
`text` field as it ought to.

I've modified the refine macro so that the `#[refineable]` attribute
works with `TextStyleRefinement` as well as the usual `TextStyle`.
(Perhaps a little bit haphazardly by simply checking whether the name
ends in Refinement - there may be a better solution there).

This PR resolves the motivating problem and triggers the assertion in
the above code as you'd expect. I've compiled zed under these changes
and all seems to be in order there.

Release Notes:

- N/A

---------

Co-authored-by: Antonio Scandurra <me@as-cii.com>
2025-12-15 13:30:13 +00:00
2025-10-21 09:58:26 +02:00
2025-10-17 18:49:11 +02:00
2025-12-15 11:51:18 +00:00
2025-09-23 16:49:45 +00:00
2025-05-17 12:34:42 +00:00
2025-09-16 21:58:40 +00:00
2025-12-15 11:51:18 +00:00
2025-12-15 10:14:15 +00:00
2025-10-27 13:27:59 -04:00
WIP
2023-12-14 09:25:14 -07:00
2025-03-10 01:06:11 -07:00
2024-09-30 17:46:21 -04:00
2025-11-12 20:27:04 +00:00
2025-02-04 09:02:59 -05:00
2025-02-04 09:02:59 -05:00
2025-10-27 13:27:59 -04:00
2025-11-10 22:05:46 +00:00
2025-10-17 18:58:14 +00:00
2025-03-10 01:06:11 -07:00

Zed

Zed CI

Welcome to Zed, a high-performance, multiplayer code editor from the creators of Atom and Tree-sitter.


Installation

On macOS, Linux, and Windows you can download Zed directly or install Zed via your local package manager.

Other platforms are not yet available:

Developing Zed

Contributing

See CONTRIBUTING.md for ways you can contribute to Zed.

Also... we're hiring! Check out our jobs page for open roles.

Licensing

License information for third party dependencies must be correctly provided for CI to pass.

We use cargo-about to automatically comply with open source licenses. If CI is failing, check the following:

  • Is it showing a no license specified error for a crate you've created? If so, add publish = false under [package] in your crate's Cargo.toml.
  • Is the error failed to satisfy license requirements for a dependency? If so, first determine what license the project has and whether this system is sufficient to comply with this license's requirements. If you're unsure, ask a lawyer. Once you've verified that this system is acceptable add the license's SPDX identifier to the accepted array in script/licenses/zed-licenses.toml.
  • Is cargo-about unable to find the license for a dependency? If so, add a clarification field at the end of script/licenses/zed-licenses.toml, as specified in the cargo-about book.
S
Description
No description provided
Readme
411 MiB
0 Stars 1 Watchers 0 Forks
Languages
Rust 94.9%
JSON-with-Comments 2.7%
Python 0.8%
Inno Setup 0.3%
Tree-sitter Query 0.3%
Other 0.5%