This switches the action back to the upstream one where the changes were
merged (thanks @\huacnlee for the quick action)
Aside from that, it does some minor fixes: It adds the bumper as an
assignee on the extensions PR and also ensures we do not try to bump
here in the repo for the test extensions.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR bumps the update action again. It also fixes a bug where a cache
issue could occur during the extension auto bump and adds update
auto-merge for PRs from staff-members in zed-industries/extensions.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Closes#51339
This should address issues with too new libstdc++.so on older/more
conservative distros such as RHEL9.
Release Notes:
- Relaxed requirement for libstdc++.so available on Linux distros.
This will allow us to also use the workflows for this repository, which
will especially come in handy once we revisit provider extensions.
Not perfect, as we will trigger some failed workflows for extensions
that were just added
Release Notes:
- N/A
This wil help with releases for extensions living this repository, which
will become more relevant once agent provider extensions are back on the
table.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This will allow us to test changes against just a subset of extensions.
Another advantage is that extension workflows will be pinned, which
allows for easier debugging and better predictability.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR takes a different approach to permissions for
assign-reviewers.yml and better filters external PRs for now.
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have:
- ~~[ ] Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing~~
- [x] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects
- ~~[ ] Aligned any UI changes with the [UI
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)~~
Release Notes:
- N/A *or* Added/Fixed/Improved ...
This pull request adds a new GitHub Actions workflow to automate
reviewer assignment for pull requests. The workflow leverages the
`codeowner-coordinator` repository to intelligently assign the most
relevant teams as reviewers based on the changes in the PR. This should
streamline the review process and ensure the right teams are notified.
**Automated Reviewer Assignment Workflow:**
* Introduced `.github/workflows/assign-reviewers.yml`, a workflow that
triggers on PR open and ready-for-review events to assign 1-2 relevant
teams as reviewers using a script from the
`zed-industries/codeowner-coordinator` repository.
* The workflow checks out the coordinator repo, sets up Python, installs
dependencies, and runs the assignment script with the necessary
environment variables.
* Reviewer assignment is only performed for PRs originating from within
the organization for now.
* The output of the reviewer assignment step is maintained as an Actions
artifact for later inspection or debugging.
Closes #ISSUE
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have:
- [ ] ~~Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing~~
- [x] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects
- [ ] ~~Aligned any UI changes with the [UI
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)~~
Release Notes:
- N/A
Gemini 3 Pro Preview has been deprecated in favor of Gemini 3.1 Pro.
This removes the `Gemini3Pro` variant from the `Model` enum and all
associated match arms, updates eval model lists, docs, and test
fixtures.
A serde alias (`"gemini-3-pro-preview"`) is kept on `Gemini31Pro` so
existing user settings gracefully migrate to the replacement model.
Closes AI-66
Release Notes:
- Removed deprecated Gemini 3 Pro Preview model; existing configurations
automatically migrate to Gemini 3.1 Pro.
Adds a consent banner, similar to the one on zed.dev
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have:
- [x] Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing
- [x] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects
- [x] Aligned any UI changes with the [UI
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
Release Notes:
- N/A
Follow-up to https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/50138
I deliberately decided against adding this in a separete job because
ts_query_ls is very fast when it comes to both formatting these as well
as checking for proper formatting. Will see here how long it takes to
install and whether we might need to adjust to account for the
installation time.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Implements a basic web platform for the wasm32-unknown-unknown target
for gpui
Release Notes:
- N/A *or* Added/Fixed/Improved ...
---------
Co-authored-by: John Tur <john-tur@outlook.com>
GitHub 4 me 0 - after testing for x times in a local and even the remote
setup provided by Namespace during an action, this now adds a dedicated
step to debug the failure we are seeing in extension tests to finally
resolve said issue.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Disable the cron schedule for the background agent MVP workflow. Manual
runs via workflow_dispatch are still available.
The workflow was running daily on weekdays but the project is being
paused. This change:
- Comments out the schedule trigger
- Adds a note pointing to the Notion doc for context
- Preserves the ability to run manually
See [Background Agent for
Zed](https://www.notion.so/Background-Agent-for-Zed-3038aa087eb980449b9ee02f70ae8413)
Notion doc for current status and contacts to resume this work.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Cleans up a new GitHub Actions workflow.
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have:
- ~~[ ] Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing~~
- [x] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects
- ~~[ ] Aligned any UI changes with the [UI
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)~~
Release Notes:
- N/A
Lost another battle to the GitHub docs. Instead, now let's just do it
ourselves here in bash and not guess whatever GitHub is referring to in
their documentation..
Release Notes:
- N/A
## Summary
Fork PRs don't have access to repository secrets (`FACTORY_API_KEY`),
causing the docs suggestions workflow to fail when triggered by external
contributor PRs.
This adds a condition to skip the `batch-suggestions` job when the PR
originates from a fork (`github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name
!= github.repository`).
## Context
See failing job:
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/actions/runs/22323201362/job/64586740764
The `pull_request` trigger doesn't pass secrets to workflows running on
fork PRs for security reasons. This is expected GitHub behavior.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Gives the compilation in a repository with a few more grammars some more
time to run. Also adds the Rust cache which might be utilized here
during Rust compilation.
Release Notes:
- N/A
More precisely, the name of the GitHub project board in question is
“Closed bugs with new comments”, and since GitHub seems to do the
closing and the commenting separately (and, crucially for this
automation, in that order) when the closer uses the “Close with comment”
functionality, we want to skip the comments added within 30 seconds
after the closing.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Add a script that classifies open and closed issues that the duplicate
bot commented (or not commented) on and puts them into the appropriate
columns of the dedicated github project board. Add a workflow that calls
that script for every closed issue and also on a schedule (that's for
the open ones).
If you're reading this some time way later and there's no bot running
around the repository leaving comments like “This issue appears to be a
duplicate of...”, you can delete these files.
Release Notes:
- N/A
The failure in #49661 was caused by a broken pipe, which then led to
tests not being ran.
Co-authored-by: Marshall Bowers <marshall@zed.dev>
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have:
- [ ] Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing
- [ ] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects
- [ ] Aligned any UI changes with the [UI
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
Release Notes:
- N/A
Co-authored-by: Marshall Bowers <marshall@zed.dev>
## Summary
Fixes the `SyntaxError: Unexpected identifier 'gemini'` error in the
cherry-pick documentation suggestions workflow.
## Problem
The 'Post suggestions as PR comment' step was directly interpolating
markdown content into a JavaScript template literal:
```javascript
const suggestions = `${{ steps.analyze.outputs.suggestions }}`;
```
When the suggestions contained backticks, `${}` sequences, or other
special characters (like the `gemini-3.1-pro-preview` model name in
markdown code blocks), it broke the JavaScript syntax.
## Solution
Write suggestions to a file in `$RUNNER_TEMP` and read it using
`fs.readFileSync()` in the script step. This avoids all GitHub Actions
template interpolation and JavaScript string parsing issues.
## Testing
This should fix the failed run:
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/actions/runs/22194396124/job/64190762087
Release Notes:
- N/A
Add exponential backoff retry logic (3 attempts with 5s/10s/15s delays)
to the Droid CLI installation and
docs-suggest script execution steps in both the batch-suggestions and
cherry-pick-suggestions jobs.
This handles intermittent Factory API authentication issues that can
cause workflow failures when the API is temporarily unavailable or
rate-limited.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Finn Evers